High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed; Land Tribunal directed ...

Basheer V.P. vs The Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal - Tirurangadi, and The Village Officer, Pallikkal Village

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.9559 OF 2021(T)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-04-09
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, to dispose of S.M.No.658/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C) No. 28398 of 2017 and connected cases). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed; Land Tribunal directed to dispose of S.M.658/2020 strictly in accordance with law and in line with Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions; No order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • BASHEER.V.P, AGED 41 YEARS S/O.BEERAN KUTTY V.P., VAKKATTIL POONATTIL HOUSE, PULLIPARAMBA, CHELAMBRA, TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN – 673 634

Respondents

  • THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), LAND TRIBUNAL- TIRURANGADI, TIRURANGADI PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA- 676 306
  • THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PALLIKKAL VILLAGE, PALLIKKAL P O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-673 634

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY-SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Basheer V.P., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to compel the 1st respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to decide S.M.No.658/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi. The Land Tribunal had initiated suo motu proceedings under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for the assignment of the right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The petitioner’s thrust is for expeditious disposal, particularly because purchase certificates often become relevant only when a loan is sought from banks, and delays may affect credit. In Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) and another, the Court had cautioned about routine writ petitions seeking speedy disposal and emphasised seniority-based disposal, discouraging out-of-turn resolution. It also relied on GO GO.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018, establishing Village Officers to assist Tribunals and prioritising senior citizens. The judgment notes the pendency of suo motu matters and ultimately directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.658/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions. The disposition is without costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Seniority of registration must be maintained (seniority principle)
  • Expeditious disposal of cases
  • Priority to cases of senior citizens
  • Land Tribunals should dispose cases on seniority basis and not break seniority except by court order
  • Reports may be obtained through Village Officers when direct reporting is delayed

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus under Article 226 to compel the 1st respondent to decide S.M.No.658/2020 on the Land Tribunal’s file and urges expeditious disposal of the case, highlighting that certainty of purchase certificates is often sought to obtain bank loans, thus mandating timely action.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents emphasize the heavy pendency before the Land Tribunal (about 2192 cases) and rely on Narayanan Namboodiri to ensure disposal in accordance with law and seniority. They point to GO 09/2018/RD enabling Village Officers to assist Tribunals and advocate obtaining reports through Village Officers to expedite proceedings, while prioritizing senior citizens’ cases and ensuring structured timelines.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveThis court’s decision in Narayanan Namboodiri provided explicit directions on expeditious disposal and seniority-based handling of Land Tribunal matters, which the present judgment adopts for disposal of S.M.No.658/2020.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Basheer V.P. vs The Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal - Tirurangadi, and The Village Officer, Pallikkal Village and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.9559 OF 2021(T)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **BASHEER.V.P, AGED 41 YEARS S/O.BEERAN KUTTY V.P., VAKKATTIL POONATTIL HOUSE, PULLIPARAMBA, CHELAMBRA, TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN – 673 634** **BY ADV. SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), LAND TRIBUNAL- TIRURANGADI, TIRURANGADI PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA- 676 306. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PALLIKKAL VILLAGE, PALLIKKAL P O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-673 634** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY-SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.9559 OF 2021(T) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.658/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 6.88 Ares of land comprised in Re-Sy.No.107/10 of Pallikkal Village, Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.9559 OF 2021(T) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.9559 OF 2021(T) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.9559 OF 2021(T) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.9559 OF 2021(T) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Pallikkal Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.658/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P2 report dated 28.12.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi is 2192. W.P(C).No.9559 OF 2021(T) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.658/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, to dispose of S.M.No.658/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.9559 OF 2021(T) -8- ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:** **EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 02.11.2020.** **EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE SUO MOTU REPORT IN SUO MOTU PROCEEDINGS NO.658/2020 DATED 28.12.2020.**