High Court of KeralaDivision BenchDisposed of; directions issued for constitution...

Balu Kenath and A Mohan Das v. State of Kerala and others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) No. 37496 of 2022

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
  • P. G. Ajithkumar
Judgment Date
2022-11-23
Court Decision / Holding
The petition is disposed of by directing the 3rd respondent to proceed with the meeting on 24.11.2022 at 11:00 a.m. to form the Vela Committee for 2023. Members must be regular worshippers, be willing to work for the temple, and must not be employed elsewhere, nor actively engage in political activities; all selected members shall file an affidavit confirming these aspects. The Additional District Police Chief shall ensure no law and order issues. All other reliefs are left open.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; directions issued for constitution of Vela Committee with specific eligibility and order-maintenance safeguards.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Balu Kenath
  • A Mohan Das

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by the Secretary to Government, Department of Devaswom, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram-695001
  • Commissioner, Malabar Devaswom Board, Housefed Complex, Eranhipalam, Kozhikode-673006
  • Assistant Commissioner, Malabar Devaswom Board, Palakkad Division, Civil Station, Palakkad-678001
  • Deputy Commissioner, Malabar Devaswom Board, Palakkad Division, Civil Station, Palakkad-678001
  • Executive Officer, Manappuliyakav u Bhagavathy Temple, East Yakkara, KunnathoorMade Post, Palakkad-678013
  • Malabar Devaswom Board represented by its Secretary, Housefed Complex, Eranhipalam, Kozhikode-673006
  • ADDL. R7. District Police Chief, YakkaRoad, Palakkad-678018

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Kaleeswaram Raj
  • • Thulasi K. Raj
  • • Shilpa Soman

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri S Rajmohan - Senior Government Pleader
  • • Sri R. Lakshmi Narayanan - Standing Counsel, Malabar Devaswom Board
  • • Sri K. Mohanakannan - for R5

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition (Art. 226, Constitution of India) by devotees of Sree Manappulli Bhagavathi Temple, Palakkad, challenged Ext. P11 (dated 19.11.2022) notification issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Malabar Devaswom Board, for constituting a Vela Committee to conduct the Vela festival in 2023. The temple is a controlled institution under the Malabar Devaswom Board. The petition sought quashing of Ext. P11 and other reliefs. On admission, the court noted the need for a properly constituted Vela Committee to avert potential law and order issues, recalling the court’s earlier pronouncements. It relied on the criteria laid down in K. Chathu Achan v. State of Kerala and others (ILR 2022 (4) Kerala 199) regarding selection of non-hereditary trustees, and held that these criteria could be applied to the Vela Committee in view of Ext. P7 Government order dated 18.01.2019, as modified by Ext. P8 on 27.11.2019, incorporating additional conditions. The learned Government Pleader and the Malabar Devaswom Board’s counsel conceded there is no current law and order issue, with police to maintain order on 24.11.2022. The court directed the 3rd respondent to proceed with the meeting on 24.11.2022 at 11:00 a.m., with members being regular worshippers, not employed or politically active, to sign an affidavit. All other reliefs were left open.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaG.O.(RT) No. 194/2019/REVENUE dated 18.01.2019G.O.(RT) No. 3538/2019/RD dated 27.11.2019Ext.P7 Government Order dated 18.01.2019Ext.P8 Government Order dated 27.11.2019

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contended that Ext.P11 notification for forming a Vela Committee should be quashed as it could lead to a mismanaged or politicized committee. They urged that the Vela Committee’s constitution must strictly follow Ext.P7 (GO 18.01.2019) as modified by Ext.P8 (27.11.2019), so as to ensure a body of regular worshippers with no political or employment conflicts, thereby preserving temple sanctity and public order. They sought safeguards and declarations to keep the process transparent and law-abiding.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents argued for strict adherence to Ext.P7 and Ext.P8 in constituting the Vela Committee, emphasizing that there was no current law and order issue. They maintained that the court should not interfere with the mechanism already laid down for temple governance and that the selection criteria from K. Chathu Achan (ILR 2022 (4) Kerala 199) could guide the process.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
K. Chathu Achan v. State of Kerala and othersILR 2022 (4) Kerala 199PositiveThe court relied on the criteria laid down in this decision for selecting non-hereditary trustees, applying the same principles to the Vela Committee's composition.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Balu Kenath and A Mohan Das v. State of Kerala and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT`** # **`THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN`** ## **`&`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR ``` ``` WEDNESDAY, THE 23[RD] DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA, ``` ``` 1944 ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 37496 OF 2022 ``` ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` 1 BALU KENATH, AGED 49 YEARS S/O. LATE T. RAMACHANDRAN, B5/6, BSNL, QUARTERS, KALLEPPULLY, PALAKKAD-678 005, PIN - 678005 ``` ``` 2 A MOHAN DAS, AGED 71 YEARS S/O LATE PARAMESWARAN NAIR, PLOT NO. 52, DEVI NAGAR, NURANI POST, PALAKKAD-678 004 ``` ``` BY ADVS. KALEESWARAM RAJ THULASI K. RAJ SHILPA SOMAN ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** |**`1`**|**`STATE OF KERALA`**| |---|---| ||**`REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,`**| ||**`DEPARTMENT OF DEVASWOM, SECRETARIAT,`**| ||**`THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001, PIN - 695001`**| |**`2`**|**`COMMISSIONER`**| ||**`MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, HOUSEFED COMPLEX,`**| ||**`ERANHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE-673006`**| |**`3`**|**`ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,`**| ||**`MALABAR DEVESWOM BOARD, PALAKKAD DIVISION, CIVIL`**| ||**`STATION, PALAKKAD-678001.`**| 2 WP(C) NO. 37496 OF 2022 - **`4 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MALABAR DEVESWOM BOARD, PALAKKAD DIVISION, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD-678001.`** - **`5 EXECUTIVE OFFICER MANAPULIYKAVU BHAGAVATHY TEMPLE, EAST YAKKARA,, KUNNATHOORMADE POST PALAKKAD-678013`** - **`6 MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOUSE FED COMPLEX, ERANHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE-673 006.`** - **`7 ADDL.R7. DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, YAKKARA ROAD, NEAR KSRTC BUS STAND, PALAKKAD-678 018`** ``` ADDL. R7 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 23.11.2022 IN I.A.NO.1 OF 2022 ``` ``` OTHER PRESENT: ``` ``` SRI S RAJMOHAN- SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI R.LAKSHMI NARAYAN- STANDING COUNSEL -MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD SRI K.MOHANAKANNAN - FOR R5 ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` 3 WP(C) NO. 37496 OF 2022 ## **JUDGMENT** Anil K. Narendran, J. The petitioners, who are the devotees of Sree Manappulli Bhagavathi of Sree Manappullikkavu Bhagavathi Temple, Kizhakke Yakkara in Palakkad District, which is a controlled institution under the 6[th] respondent Malabar Devaswom Board, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P11 notification dated 19.11.2022 issued by the 3[rd] respondent Assistant Commissioner, Malabar Devaswom Board, Palakkad Division, whereby a meeting has been scheduled on 24.11.2022 to form a Vela Committee to conduct Vela festival in Sree Manappullikkavu Bhagavathi Temple for the year 2023. The petitioners have also sought for other consequential reliefs. 2. On 22.11.2022, when this writ petition came up for admission, we have issued notice on admission by special messenger to the 5[th] respondent. The learned Senior Government Pleader took notice for the 1[st] respondent and the learned Standing Counsel for Malabar Devaswom Board took notice for respondents 2 to 4 and 6. 4 WP(C) NO. 37496 OF 2022 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Senior Government Pleader for the 1[st] respondent and additional 7[th] respondent, learned Standing Counsel for Malabar Devaswom Board for respondents 2 to 4 and 6 and Adv.Sri.K.Mohanakannan, learned counsel for the 5[th] respondent Executive Officer. 4. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have approached this Court in this writ petition seeking various reliefs, in order to ensure constitution of a proper Vela Committee to conduct Vela festival in Sree Manappullikkavu Bhagavathi Temple for the year 2023. 5. The learned Standing Counsel for Malabar Devaswom Board and also the learned counsel for the 5[th] respondent Executive Officer would submit that the constitution of Vela Committee pursuant to Ext.P11 notification dated 19.11.2022 shall be made strictly in terms of Ext.P7 order dated 18.01.2019, which stands modified to certain extent by Ext.P8 order dated 27.11.2019, incorporating certain additional conditions in the constitution of Vela Committee. 5 WP(C) NO. 37496 OF 2022 ## 6. In **K. Chathu Achan v. State of Kerala and others** **[ILR 2022 (4) Kerala 199]** in the context of notification issued by the Commissioner, Malabar Devaswom Board, in the matter of selection of non-hereditary trustees in temples which are controlled institutions under the Malabar Devaswom Board, this Court held that for appointment as non-hereditary trustee of the temple, the applicant should be a regular worshipper of the temple, who is prepared to actively work for the betterment of the temple. Persons who are busy with their employment, office bearers of political parties, active politicians or those indulging in active participation in the activities of a political party cannot aspire appointment as non-hereditary trustee of the temple. 7. From the materials on record and also the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, we notice that the formation of Vela Committee to conduct Vela festival in Sree Manappullikkavu Bhagavathi Temple during previous years had resulted in law and order issues. It is for that reason, the petitioners have approached this Court in this writ petition, seeking various reliefs. 8. The criteria laid down by this Court in **K. Chathu Achan [ILR 2022 (4) Kerala 199]** in the matter of selection of 6 WP(C) NO. 37496 OF 2022 non-hereditary trustees in controlled institutions under the Malabar Devaswom Board can be made applicable to the constitution of Vela Committee in connection with Vela festival in Sree Manappullikkavu Bhagavathi Temple, in terms of Ext.P11 notification dated 19.11.2022, in view of the conditions stipulated in Ext.P7 Government order dated 18.11.2019, which stands modified to certain extent by Ext.P8 order dated 27.11.2019 incorporating certain additional conditions. 9. The learned Senior Government Pleader, on instructions from the additional 7[th] respondent District Police Chief would submit that, at present there is no law and order situation in the locality and the Police shall maintain law and order on 24.11.2022, in connection with constitution of Vela Committee. 10. In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the 3[rd] respondent Assistant Commissioner to proceed with the meeting scheduled on 24.11.2022 at 11:00 a.m. for the formation of Vela Committee in connection with Vela festival in Sree Manappullikkavu Bhagavathi Tempe for the year 2023. The persons elected as members of the Vela Committee shall be regular worshippers of the temple, who are prepared to 7 WP(C) NO. 37496 OF 2022 actively work for the betterment of the temple. Persons who are busy with their employment, office bearers of political parties, active politicians or those indulging in active participation in the activities of a political party cannot aspire membership in the Vela Committee. The 3[rd] respondent Assistant Commissioner shall get a declaration from the persons so elected, in the form of an affidavit, on the above aspect. 11. The additional 7[th] respondent District Police Chief shall take necessary steps to ensure that there is no law and order issues in connection with the meeting scheduled to be held on 24.11.2022 for constituting the Vela Committee. All other reliefs sought for in this writ petition are left open. Sd/- ## **ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE** Sd/- ## **P.G. AJITHKUMAR JUDGE** bkn/- 8 WP(C) NO. 37496 OF 2022 ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 37496/2022`** |**`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`**|| |---|---| |**`Exhibit P1`**|**`TRUE COPY OF GO(RT) NO. 3376/03/REVENUE`**| ||**`DATED 30.10 .2003 ISSUED BY THE IST`**| ||**`RESPONDENT.`**| |**`Exhibit P2`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 05.12.2017`**| ||**`ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE IST`**| ||**`RESPONDENT.`**| |**`Exhibit P3`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE GO(RT) NO. 5510/2017`**| ||**`DATED`**<br>**`21.12.2017`**<br>**`ISSUED`**<br>**`BY`**<br>**`THE`**<br>**`1ST`**| ||**`RESPONDENT.`**| |**`Exhibit P4`**|**`TRUE`**<br>**`COPY`**<br>**`OF`**<br>**`THE`**<br>**`ADVERTISEMENT`**<br>**`ON`**| ||**`02.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.`**| |**`Exhibit P5`**|**`TRUE`**<br>**`COPY`**<br>**`OF`**<br>**`THE`**<br>**`JUDGMENT`**<br>**`DATED`**| ||**`12.12.2018 IN WP(C) NO. 39703/2018`**| |**`Exhibit P6`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14.11.2017`**| ||**`ISSUED BY THE HEREDITARY TRUSTEE NAMELY`**| ||**`K,KESAVADASA MENON TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`**| |**`Exhibit P7`**|**`TRUE`**<br>**`COPY`**<br>**`OF`**<br>**`G.O.(RT)`**<br>**`NO.`**| ||**`194/2019/REVENUE DATED 18.01.2019.`**| |**`Exhibit P8`**|**`TRUE`**<br>**`COPY`**<br>**`OF`**<br>**`THE`**<br>**`G.O.(RT)`**<br>**`NO.`**| ||**`3538/2019/RD DATED 27.11.2019.`**| |**`Exhibit P9`**|**`TRUE`**<br>**`COPY`**<br>**`OF`**<br>**`THE`**<br>**`REVISION`**<br>**`PETITION`**| ||**`SUBMITTED BY THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY`**| ||**`THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT`**| ||**`DATED 12.07.2022.`**| |**`Exhibit P10`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE REMINDER LETTER SENT BY`**| ||**`THE 1ST PETITIONER ON 19.09.2022`**| |**`Exhibit P11`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE ADVERTISEMENT DATED`**| ||**`19.11.2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`**| |**`Exhibit P12`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 05.11.2022`**| ||**`WRITTEN BY SRI. CHENDHAMARAKSHA MENON TO`**| ||**`THE PRESIDENT OF THE DEVASWOM BOARD.`**|