High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of; Land Tribunal direct...

Balan v. Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur and Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Tirur

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.5453 of 2021 (F)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-03-02
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.09/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment referred to supra; no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of; Land Tribunal directed to dispose of S.M.No.9/2021 in strict accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • BALAN, AGED 55 YEARS S/O.NARAYANAN, VALIYAVALAPPIL HOUSE, TANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT

Respondents

  • LAND TRIBUNAL, (LAND REFORMS), TIRUR, TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679101
  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,(LAND REFORMS), LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR, TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679101

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a mandamus directing the Special Tahsildar (LR) to expeditiously conduct an enquiry and dispose of S.M. No.9/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, relating to 36.00 acres of land in Sy. No. 233/2018, Pariyapuram Village, Malappuram District. The suo motu proceedings, initiated under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, concern vesting of landlord rights in the Government under Section 72 and the issue of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The petitioner contends that timely disposal is essential because a purchase certificate may be needed for bank financing, and that the current pendency delays are prejudicial. The court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) and another (W.P.(C) No. 28398 of 2017, dated 14.03.2018), which held that tribunals must dispose cases in order of registration and provided directions for expeditious disposal, including using Village Officers to obtain reports and prioritising senior citizens. The present case finds the pending suo motu cases excessive (4987) and directs the Land Tribunal to comply strictly with the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, including seniority-based disposal, use of reports from Village Officers, and other procedural steps. The GO (P).No.09/2018/RD will form part of the judgment.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 14Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD, dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Seniority principle in disposal of cases (cases to be disposed on seniority basis)
  • Expeditious disposal of cases, prioritizing senior citizens' petitions
  • Land Tribunals must not break the seniority of cases except as directed by this Court or higher authorities

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that expeditious disposal of S.M.No.9/2021 is essential to facilitate loan arrangements and ensure orderly processing of rights vested in the Government under the Kerala Land Reforms Act; the petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct expeditious enquiry and disposal in line with the directions re-iterated in Narayanan Namboodiri to prevent delay and arbitrary out-of-turn disposal.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents emphasize the overall pendency in Land Tribunal matters (thousands of suo motu cases) and contend that disposal should proceed in accordance with seniority and existing law; they advocate adherence to the Civil Service style management of cases and the guidelines laid down by the Court in Narayanan Namboodiri while highlighting administrative challenges and the need to maintain due process.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveJudgment cited and followed as controlling authority; directs expeditious disposal and adherence to seniority-based processing, which the present Court adopts.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Balan v. Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur and Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Tirur and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.5453 OF 2021(F)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **BALAN, AGED 55 YEARS S/O.NARAYANAN, VALIYAVALAPPIL HOUSE, TANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 LAND TRIBUNAL, (LAND REFORMS), TIRUR, TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679101. 2 SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,(LAND REFORMS), LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR, TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679101.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.5453 OF 2021(F) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.9/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 36.00 Ares of land comprised in Sy.No.233/2018 of Pariyapuram Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.5453 OF 2021(F) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.5453 OF 2021(F) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers W.P(C).No.5453 OF 2021(F) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.5453 OF 2021(F) -6- directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Pariyapuram Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.9/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 certificate dated 08.01.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.09/2021 W.P(C).No.5453 OF 2021(F) -7- following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 9. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.09/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.5453 OF 2021(F) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 08.01.2021 IN SM.NO.09/2021 ISSUED BY FIRST RESPONDENT.**