High CourtSingle JudgeAppeal dismissed.

BAGIRATH SINGH AND ANR. v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Case / Petition Number:Civil Appeal No. 647 of 2000

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Hon'ble Judges
  • B.P. Singh
Judgment Date
2005-09-06
Court Decision / Holding
Appeal dismissed.
Final Disposition
Appeal dismissed.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Bagirath Singh and Anr.

Respondents

  • State of Haryana and Ors.

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • D P C Jain
  • • Mahendra Anand
  • • Ms. S. Janani
  • • Keertee Sinha

Counsels for Respondents

  • • S.P. Goyal
  • • Arnita Gupta
  • • Prashant Rana
  • • Himanshu Upadhyaya

Case Synopsis & Summary

Bagirath Singh and Anr. filed Civil Appeal No. 647 of 2000 challenging an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing their writ petition (Civil Writ Petition No. 18310 of 1998) and later the High Court’s dismissal of their Review Application No. 357/99 in the same matter. The appeal, heard in the Supreme Court, concerns the propriety of dismissing the writ petition and the subsequent review petition by the High Court. The respondents were represented by counsel including S.P. Goyal, Arnita Gupta, Prashant Rana and Himanshu Upadhyaya, while the appellants were represented by DPC Jain, Mahendra Anand, Ms. S. Janani and Keertee Sinha. The judgment, delivered by Justice B.P. Singh, records that the Court today dismissed Civil Appeal No. 646 (or 647) of 2000 arising from the challenged writ petition, finding no merit in the appeal and thus upholding the High Court’s orders. The outcome is a dismissal of the appeal, effectively sustaining the High Court’s dismissal of the writ petition and, by extension, the related review petition. The decision underscores the limited scope for appellate intervention in writ proceedings where no substantial ground for interference has been demonstrated, resulting in the appellate dismissal and preservation of the High Court’s rulings.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against BAGIRATH SINGH AND ANR. v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

A **B** .• c E ## BAGIRATH SINGH AND ANR. _v._ STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 > [B.P. SINGH AND S.H. KAPADIA, JJ.J _Practice and Procedure-Appeal filed against the order of dismissal of_ _**writ petition-Dismissed by Supreme Court-There is no merit in the present** appeal against dismissal of the Review Petition by the High Court-Hence_ _**dismissed.**_ CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 647 of 2000. From the Judgment and Order dated 7.5. 1999 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Review Application No. 357/99 in C.W.P. No. 183 JO of 1998. **D** P.C. Jain and Mahendra Anand, Ms. S. Janani and Keertee Sinha with them for the Appellants. S.P. Goyal, Arnita Gupta, Prashant Rana and Himanshu Upadhyaya for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by • **B.P. SINGH, J.** : This Civil Appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the order of the High Court dismissing the review petition filed by **F** them for review of the judgment and order of the High Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 18310 of 1998. > We have today dismissed Civil Appeal No. 646 of 2000 arising out of CWP No. 18310 of 1998. We, therefore, find no merit in this appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed. G Appeal dismissed. R.P. 1179