Babu.PK (Mannur Babu) v. State of Kerala & Others; Sanku T Das v. State of Kerala & Others
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Anil K. Narendran
- G. Girish
- Judgment Date
- 2023-12-18
- Court Decision / Holding
- Writ petitions disposed of; Ext.R2(a) order granting permission for Nava Kerala Sadas on 18.12.2023 is set aside; The District Collector, Kollam, is directed to remove temporary structures forthwith; The venue for the 20.12.2023 event has been shifted as adjudged by the court.
- Final Disposition
- Writ petitions disposed; Ext.R2(a) order set aside; District Collector to remove temporary structures; Venue for Nava Kerala Sadas shifted to the date scheduled.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- BABU.PK (MANNUR BABU)
- SANKU T DAS
Respondents
- STATE OF KERALA
- TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
- THE PRESIDENT, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
- THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, KADAKKAL PEEDIKA DEVI TEMPLE, KADAKKAL
- THE COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
- THE ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER
- THE SUB GROUP OFFICER
- THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM
- THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADAKKAL POLICE STATION
- THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM
- THE SECRETARY, REVENUE (DEVASWOM DEPARTMENT), GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • V.S.Chandrasekharan
- • M.V.Das
- • S.Jayakumar
- • Lekshmi Swaminathan
- • N.K.Ramachandran
- • C.A.Sabitha
- • Shahim Bin Aziz
- • C. Dinesh
- • Sinu.G.Nath
- • Anu Prabhakar
- • Prasoon.K.P
Counsels for Respondents
- • Ashok M. Cherian - Addl. Advocate General
- • G. Santhosh Kumar - Standing Counsel, Travancore Devaswom Board
Case Synopsis & Summary
These writ petitions challenge the Travancore Devaswom Board's permission to conduct the Nava Kerala Sadas in the Kadakkal Peedika Devi Temple precincts. The petitions, filed by devotees of Kadakkal Devi Temple, seek mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent TD Board and the 3rd respondent President of the Board to consider a representation (Ext.P2) and to restrain the temple premises from being used for Nava Kerala Sadas. The petitions also seek certiorari to quash Ext.R2(a) granting permission for the event on 18.12.2023 and a mandamus to the State to refrain from holding the event in the sacred ground, asserting illegality under Article 25 of the Constitution. On 18.12.2023 the Court disposed of the petitions along with connected matters, noting that the venue for Nava Kerala Sadas scheduled for 20.12.2023 had already been shifted and directing immediate removal of temporary structures if any. The judgment relies on existing statutory provisions under the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act and the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship Act and Rules, as well as prior Kerala High Court decisions that limit non-worship activities within temple premises. The Court ultimately set aside the Board’s Ext.R2(a) order for 18.12.2023 and emphasized adherence to the statutory objects of the Devaswom.
Provisions of Law Cited
Legal Doctrines & Maxims
- Politics has no role to play in daily worship and ceremonies in temples.
- Cultural or social activities unconnected with temple worship have no role to play in temple festivals.
- Temple premises cannot be used for activities inconsistent with the objects of the Trust (Thekkinkadu Maidan principle).
- Temple land management is governed by the Trust and statutory provisions; deviations require compliance with objects of the Trust.
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioners contend that the Nava Kerala Sadas event cannot be held in the Kadakkal temple ground as it is not part of daily worship and ceremonial rites; permitting such a programme would violate temple objects and the statutory framework governing Devaswom properties. They argue that the decision to permit Nava Kerala Sadas (Ext.R2(a)) contravenes provisions of the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act (especially sections 15A and 31) and the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Act and Rules (6 and 8), and infringes the rights of devotees to worship as per Article 25 of the Constitution. They rely on precedent holding that political or non-worship activities in temple premises are inappropriate and that temple property must be used consistent with trust objects and worship-oriented activities.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents contend that the Travancore Devaswom Board has statutory authority to regulate and permit events within Devaswom properties, including cultural activities, provided they do not infringe on worship or temple integrity. They note that Ext.R2(a) was granted with conditions and that a shift of venue had been decided for the 20.12.2023 event. They argue conformity with statutory duties under relevant acts and rules and rely on past decisions to permit broader cultural activities within temple precincts, subject to the objects of the trust and the law.
Cited Precedents (5)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Major Vellayani Devi Temple Advisory Committee | 2023 (2) KHC 290 | Positive | Supports the principle that politics or non-worship activities have no place in temple worship and ceremonies. |
| Hindu Seva Kendram v. State of Kerala and others | 2023 (3) KHC 258 | Positive | Held that cultural or social activities unconnected with temple worship have no role in temple festivals. |
| K.B.Sumodh v. Commissioner, Cochin Devaswom Board | 2023:KER:25530 | Positive | States that temple/trust land use must align with the objects of the Trust; non-permissible activities prohibited. |
| G.Vysan and another v. State of Kerala and others | 2023:KER.52256 | Positive | Temple premises cannot be used for mass drills or weaponry training; reinforces worship-centric use of temple spaces. |
| Jayakumar J. and another v. State of Kerala and others | 2023:KER:80455 | Mentioned Only | Cited for legal doctrine but not the primary basis of the current decision; referred to as law laid down. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Babu.PK (Mannur Babu) v. State of Kerala & Others; Sanku T Das v. State of Kerala & Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.