High Court of KeralaDivision BenchDisposed / Petition closed

B. RADHAKRISHNA MENON and V. SREEKUMAR v. Travancore Devaswom Board and Others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) No.38128/18

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • P. R. Ramachandra Menon
  • N. Anil Kumar
Judgment Date
2019-03-18
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition stands closed; the grievance redressed by interim orders and the final report of the Observer Team; no further directions necessary.
Final Disposition
Disposed / Petition closed

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • B. RADHAKRISHNA MENON
  • V. SREEKUMAR

Respondents

  • Travancore Devaswom Board
  • Devaswom Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board
  • Executive Officer, Sabarimala Devaswom / Sabarimala Sree Dharmasastha Temple
  • State of Kerala
  • Secretary to Government Department of Devaswom, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
  • Secretary to Government Department of Home, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
  • District Collector, Pathanamthitta
  • Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC)
  • Additional Respondent 9
  • Union of India

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri S. Subhash Chand

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri S. Rajmohan
  • • Sri K. Sasikumar
  • • Sri C.P. Sudhakara Prasad
  • • Sri M. Gopikrishnan Nambiar
  • • Smt. K. Parvathy
  • • Sri Joson Manavalan
  • • Sri K. John Mathai
  • • Sri Kuyran Thomas
  • • Sri Paulose C. Abraham
  • • Sri P. Gopinath (Sr.)
  • • Sri P. Narayanan
  • • Sri Suman Chakravarthy
  • • Sri V. Manu

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition challenges restrictions imposed during the Sabarimala pilgrimage for the 2018-19 season by the Travancore Devaswom Board and state authorities. The petitioners contend that the measures, including travel restrictions from Nilackal to Pampa, parking and return of pilgrims in private vehicles, time limits on darshan between Pampa, Sannidhanam and back, and restrictions on Namakshari Mantra Japam within Sannidhanam precincts, infringe the religious observances essential to worship at Sabarimala Sree Ayyappa temple and violate fundamental rights. They rely on Sections 15A, 24 and 31 of the Travancore Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 to demand discharge of statutory duties by the Devaswom Board and authorities in accordance with law. They claim the restrictions encroach on Articles 14, 19, 21 and 25 of the Constitution, undermining equal protection, freedom of movement, personal liberty and freedom of religion. The petition originally sought mandamus and related reliefs to ensure unhindered pilgrimage. Over the course of proceedings, interim orders were issued, including appointing a Team of Observers to monitor the festival. After reviewing the final Observers’ report (No. 4) and pending SSCRs, the court found that the grievance has been substantially redressed and proceeded to close the petition, with no further directions deemed necessary.

Provisions of Law Cited

Travancore Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 — Sections 15A, 24 and 31Constitution of India — Articles 14, 19, 21 and 25

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Mandamus
  • Essential religious practices doctrine
  • Fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 25

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contend that the restrictions on vehicle travel between Nilackal and Pampa, parking at Pampa, time limits for darshan and restrictions on Namakshari Mantra Japam undermine essential religious practices at Sabarimala and offend fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 25. They seek mandamus to ensure the statutory duties under the Travancore Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 are dischargeable in a lawful manner and that the State and Devaswom refrain from imposing unreasonable restrictions.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents defend the measures as necessary for maintaining public order, safety, and orderly administration of the temple during the pilgrimage. They rely on the Act governing Devaswoms and on security considerations overseen by the Government and Devaswom authorities, including oversight by a Team of Observers appointed by the court.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against B. RADHAKRISHNA MENON and V. SREEKUMAR v. Travancore Devaswom Board and Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON** **&** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR** **MONDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1940** **WP(C).No. 38128 of 2018** ## **PETITIONER/S:** - **1 B.RADHAKRISHNA MENON AGED 54 YEARS S/O.M.S.BHASKARA MENON, SREENIKETAN, THRIKODITHANAM P.O., CHENGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM-686 105.** - **2 V.SREEKUMAR S/O.M.VASUDEVAN NAIR, KONGARETTU HOUSE, MATHILBHAGOM, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 101.** **BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** - **1 TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD OFFICE OF THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, DEVASWOM BUILDING, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.** - **2 THE DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, OFFICE OF THE DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, DEVASWOM BUILDING, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003.** - **3 THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER SABARIMALA DEVASWOM/SABARIMALA SREE DHARMASASTHA TEMPLE, SABRIMALA, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 645.** - **4 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.** - **5 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF DEVASWOM, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.** W.P(C) No.38128/18 2 - **6 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.** - **7 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR/THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 645.** **8 THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRANSPORT BHAVAN EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , KERALA - 695 014, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.** - **9 ADDL. R9** **UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO MINISTRY OF CULTURE, SHASTRI BHAVAN C WING, NEW DELHI - 110015.** **IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 19.12.2018 IN I.A.NO. 02/2018 IN W.P.(C) 38128/2018.** **BY ADVS.** SRI.SUVIN R.MENON, CGC **SRI.S.RAJMOHAN, SC, TDB SRI.K.SASIKUMAR, SC TDB SRI.C.P.SUDHAKARA PRASAD,ADVOCATE GENERAL SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIARSC, KSRTC SMT.K.PARVATHY SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.KURYAN THOMAS SRI.PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM SRI.P.GOPINATH (SR.) SRI.P.NARAYANAN, SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY, SENIOR GOVT.PLEADER SRI.V.MANU, SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C) No.38128/18 3 ## **JUDGMENT** ## **P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J.** This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: i. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ or order directing respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 to see that the statutory duties covered by Sections 15A, 24 and 31 of the Travancore Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 are effectively discharged at Sabarimala Shrine in accordance with law, within such time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. ii. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ or order directing respondent Nos.1 to 8 to refrain from imposing any restrictions upon the petitioners from travelling by taking their own vehicles from Nilackal to Pampa, park the same at Pampa and return to Nilackal in those vehicles during the course of Sabarimala pilgrimage, 2018-19. iii. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ or order directing respondents 1 to 7 to refrain from imposing any time limit upon the petitioners in the matter of conducting Sabarimala pilgrimage including the time limit of 6 hours for commencing and concluding the same from Pampa to Sannidhanam and from Sannidhanam to Pampa which is an W.P(C) No.38128/18 4 illegal interference to the observance of essential religious practices pertaining to Sabarimala Sree Ayyappa temple worship system. iv. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ or order directing respondent Nos.1 to 7 from imposing any restrictions upon the petitioners in the matter of holding 'Namakshari Mantra Japam' (Swamiye Saranam Ayyappa) at Sannidhanam of Sabarimala Sree Ayyappa temple including Nadapanthal and the temple precincts. v. To issue a declaration that respondent Nos.1 to 8 are not at all entitled in law to impose unreasonable restrictions in the matter of travelling from Nilackal to Pampa and ascending/descending Neelimala, conducting Navaksharimantra japam and performing religious practices such as Neyyabhishekam at Sabarimala shrine and such restrictions presently being imposed are constitutionally impermissible and a direct infringement of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 25 of the Constitution of India. vi. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the respondent Nos.1 to 7 to refrain from imposing any restriction, prohibitory order, norms or guidelines or directives upon devotees at large pertaining to performance of religious or secular activities at Sabarimala shrine, W.P(C) No.38128/18 5 without the prior sanction of this Hon'ble Court, within such time s this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. 2. Heard Sri.Subhash Chand, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri.C.P.Sudhakara Prasad, the learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of the 1[st] respondent and also Mr. Raj Mohan, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1[st] respondent Devaswom. **==> picture [410 x 12] intentionally omitted <==** petitioners is with regard to the interference in the administration of the Travancore Devaswom Board by the Government and the police. Prayer is there, also not to restrict entry of the petitioners or to limit the time of worship, virtually affecting the fundamental rights enjoyed by the petitioners under the various provisions of the Constitution of India. 4. It is seen from the proceedings that, this Court had passed various interim orders at different points of time, clubbing the above writ petition along with other connected matters which were pending consideration. We passed a detailed W.P(C) No.38128/18 6 order on 27.11.2018, taking note of the need of the hour and appointing a Team of Observers consisting of the Hon'ble Mr.Justice P.R. Raman, Hon'ble Mr.Justice S. Siri Jagan, (two former Judges of this Court) and Sri.A.Hemachandran IPS, the DGP and had given appropriate directions. Another order was passed by this Court on 12.02.2018 so as to deal with the aspects mentioned therein. This was followed by the orders passed on 19.12.2018 and 03.01.2019. 5. On conclusion of the 'Mandalam Makaravilakku' festival, final report has been submitted by the Team of Observers (Report No.4). A copy of the said report has already been caused to be served to the parties concerned. The further course of action with regard to the various aspects mentioned therein can be taken care of separately in SSCRs 22 & 23/2018, which are pending. Considering the nature of grievance projected in this writ petition, we find that, by virtue of the W.P(C) No.38128/18 7 interference made by this Court and the interim orders passed at different points of time, the grievance stands substantially redressed and no further orders are necessary. In the said circumstance, the present writ petition stands closed. _**Sd/-**_ **P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON Judge** _**Sd/-**_ **N. ANIL KUMAR Judge** _okb_ _//True copy// P.S. to Judge_ W.P(C) No.38128/18 8 ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM PUBLISHED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 20/11/2018.** **EXHIBIT P1 A** **TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM PUBLISHED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 18.11.2018.** **EXHIBIT P1 B TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM PUBLISHED IN JANMABHOOMI DAILY DATED 18/11/2018. EXHIBIT P1 C TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM PUBLISHED IN TIMES OF INDIA DATED 21/11/2018.** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM OF NOTICE BEING ISSUED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICERS OF SANNIDHANAM, PAMPA AND NILACKAL.** **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19/11/2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 4.**