High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of

Ayisha v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Mini Civil Station, Ottapalam, Pattambi, Palakkad

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.7806 OF 2021(A)
Neutral Citation:/null

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K. NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-03-25
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.576/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another, W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases; no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • AYISHA, AGED 66 YEARS W/o. LATE MUHAMMED KASIM MUSALIAR, PORIYAKULAM HOUSE, PATHANAPURAM, KAVASSERI-I VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD

Respondents

  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD – 679 104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT A.C.VIDHYA- GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition (WP(C) 7806 of 2021) was filed by Ayisha, a 66-year-old resident, under Article 226 seeking a mandamus to compel the Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and dispose of Suo Motu proceeding S.M. No.576/2020 before the Land Tribunal, Pattambi. The suo motu action was initiated under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, read with Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms Rules, 1970 (based on Kavasseri-I Village report). The petitioner highlighted the urgency of the matter, being a senior citizen, and relied on the court’s decision in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases), which laid down guidelines for expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal cases and prioritization by seniority. The Government Pleader acknowledged the large pendency of suomotu proceedings (about 11,078). The court concluded that the Land Tribunal Pattambi should dispose of S.M.576/2020 strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, directing adherence to seniority and the court’s guidelines, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.576/2020 before the Land Tribunal Pattambi, basing her request on the Land Reforms Act provisions (Sections 72 and 72K) and Rules 14, 5, and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions for expeditious disposal. Her status as a senior citizen (66) is highlighted to justify prioritization and timely action.

Contentions of Respondents

The Government Pleader submits that there is a substantial pendency of suomotu proceedings (approximately 11,078) in the Land Tribunal, and the matter should proceed within the established seniority framework. He references the Government order G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD to facilitate timely reports via Village Officers and emphasizes adherence to the seniority-based disposal timetable for expeditious resolution, particularly for older applicants.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveThe court adopts and applies the Narayanan Namboodiri guidelines for expeditious disposal, prioritizing senior citizens and following a seniority-based disposal framework.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Ayisha v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Mini Civil Station, Ottapalam, Pattambi, Palakkad and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.7806 OF 2021(A)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **AYISHA, AGED 66 YEARS W/o. LATE MUHAMMED KASIM MUSALIAR, PORIYAKULAM HOUSE, PATHANAPURAM, KAVASSERI-I VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD – 679 104** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT A.C.VIDHYA- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.7806 OF 2021(A) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.576/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0729 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.299/26 in Block No.29 of Kavasseri-I Village in Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.7806 OF 2021(A) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.7806 OF 2021(A) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.7806 OF 2021(A) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.7806 OF 2021(A) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kavasseri-I Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.576/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 14.07.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 66 years. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. W.P(C).No.7806 OF 2021(A) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.576/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.576/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.7806 OF 2021(A) -8- ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:** **EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 14.07.2020**