High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of. The Court directed t...

Ayisha and Rukhiya v. The Land Tribunal, Tirur and others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.467 of 2021(G)
Neutral Citation:/NULL

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K. NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-01-18
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.1371/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another, and to apply seniority-based disposal (favoring senior citizens) within the framework already pronounced, with no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of. The Court directed the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.1371/2020 in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, with no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • AYISHA
  • RUKHIYA

Respondents

  • THE LAND TRIBUNAL
  • THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND REFORMS), LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR
  • THE VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAYOOR VILLAGE OFFICE, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM-679552

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN
  • • SRI.T.R.TARIN
  • • SRI.V.A.VINOD

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY-SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Ayisha and Rukhiya challenging the suo motu initiation by the Land Tribunal, Tirur to adjudicate on S.M.No.1371/2020, initiated under the Kerala Land Reforms Act provisions to vest right, title and interest in the Government and to issue a certificate of purchase under Section 72K for 6.88 acres in Re.Sy.No.416/152, Edayoor Village, Tirur taluk, Malappuram. The petitioners, senior citizens aged 63 and 64, seek a mandamus directing the Land Tribunal to dispose of the case within a time limit fixed by the Court. The hearing discusses the approach from a prior Narayanan Namboodiri judgment (14.03.2018) which held that disposal of Land Tribunal cases must follow seniority, and urged expeditious handling for senior citizens, while avoiding out-of-turn disposal, and possibly obtaining reports through Village Officers when revenue inspectors face shortages. The Court notes the Government’s GO and the role of Village Officers in gathering information. It records that the Land Tribunal has a large pendency (4,987 suo motu proceedings). Ultimately, the Court directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.1371/2020 strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, with no order on costs, aiming to accelerate relief for the petitioners within the established framework of priority to senior citizens and seniority-based disposal.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Seniority of registration governs disposal order in Land Tribunal cases; expeditious disposal of cases, especially those filed by senior citizens; not breaking the seniority of cases except as directed by this Court or higher authorities; reports can be obtained through Village Officers when Revenue Inspectors face shortages; Government orders form part of the Judgment.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners argued for expeditious disposal of the suo motu case (S.M.No.1371/2020) on seniority grounds and given their age (63 and 64), requesting disposal within a Court-fixed time frame; they highlighted the necessity of obtaining quicker relief (e.g., loan considerations) and urged adherence to established seniority-based disposal as laid down in Narayanan Namboodiri and the March 2018 directions.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contended the large pendency (4,987) of suo motu proceedings before the Land Tribunal and the need to proceed in accordance with the law and seniority, including utilizing Village Officers for report collection when Revenue Inspectors are short-staffed; they emphasised following the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri and avoiding out-of-turn categorization unless specifically directed by higher authorities.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as the controlling precedent for expeditious disposal and seniority-based directions; the judgment applies Narayanan Namboodiri’s directives to the instant case.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Ayisha and Rukhiya v. The Land Tribunal, Tirur and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 28TH POUSHA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.467 OF 2021(G)** ## **PETITIONERS:** |**1**|**AYISHA**| |---|---| ||**AGED 63 YEARS**| ||**W/O KUNHIMUHAMMED,**| ||**PALLIYALIL, KUTTIPPURAM,**| ||**TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.**| |**2**|**RUKHIYA**| ||**AGED 64 YEARS**| ||**W/O MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA, PARAMMEL HOUSE,**| ||**KUTTIPPURAM, TIRUR,**| ||**MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.**| ||**BY ADVS.**| ||**SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN**| ||**SRI.T.R.TARIN**| ||**SRI.V.A.VINOD**| ## **RESPONDENTS:** |**1**|**THE LAND TRIBUNAL**| |---|---| ||**REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,(LR),**| ||**TIRUR-676101.**| |**2**|**THE SPECIAL THAHSILDAR**| ||**(LAND REFORMS),LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR,**| ||**MALAPPURAM-676101.**| |**3**|**THE VILLAGE OFFICER**| ||**EDAYOOR VILLAGE OFFICE, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM-**| ||**679552.**| ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY-SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** WP(C)No.467 of 2021 2 ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Land Tribunal to consider and dispose of S.M.No.1371/2020 on the file of the said respondent, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 6.88 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.416/152 of Edayoor Village in Tirur Taluk in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated WP(C)No.467 of 2021 3 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 5. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by WP(C)No.467 of 2021 4 the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land WP(C)No.467 of 2021 5 Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other WP(C)No.467 of 2021 6 cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 6. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Edayoor Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.1371/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P3 certificate dated 10.12.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 7. The learned counsel for the petitioners would point out that the 1[st] petitioner is a senior citizen aged 63 and the 2[nd] petitioner is a senior citizen aged 64. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. 8. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land WP(C)No.467 of 2021 7 Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.1371/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 9. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.1371/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE** **yd** WP(C)No.467 of 2021 8 ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY DATED 2.11.2020. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SUO-MOTO REPORT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN SM NO.1371/2020. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 10.12.2020.** ## **RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL** **TRUE COPY** **P.A. TO JUDGE**