High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of with directions to th...

Avarankutty v. The Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Palakkad and The Village Officer, Thiruvegapura Village

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.4129 OF 2021(M)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • The Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-17
Court Decision / Holding
This writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of S.M.No.29/2019 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C) No.28398/2017 and connected cases). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with directions to the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.29/2019 in accordance with law and as per Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Avarankutty

Respondents

  • The Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Civil Station, Palakkad
  • The Village Officer, Thiruvegapura Village, Pattambi Taluk

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI. R. SREEHARI
  • • SHRI. MUHAMMADALI MANEKKATHODI

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K. Aminikutty, Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the inaction in the expeditious disposal of suo motu proceedings in S.M.No.29/2019 before the Land Tribunal, Palakkad. The petitioner, Avarankutty, a 67-year-old senior citizen, seeks a mandamus directing the Deputy Collector (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and dispose of the matter in a time frame fixed by the Court, as the Land Tribunal’s order would determine the transfer of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, including issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms Rules, 1970. The Land Tribunal initiated suo motu proceedings based on a Village Officer’s report for 0.0320 hectares in Sy.No.192/3, Block 19, Thiruvegappura. The Court recalls the Narayanan Namboodiri decision (2018), which emphasised seniority and expeditious disposal, and the GO 09/2018 to aid tribunals via Village Officers. The court notes pendency and directs disposal of S.M.29/2019 strictly in line with Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, while observing no costs. The order aims to expedite relief for senior citizens and to streamline compliance with the statutory framework.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends for a mandamus directing expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.No.29/2019 before the Land Tribunal Palakkad on grounds of the petitioner’s senior citizen status (67 years). He seeks priority in disposal and relies on the Narayanan Namboodiri guidance mandating expeditious disposal of cases and adherence to seniority, aided by GO 09/2018/RD permitting Village Officers to furnish information for timely action. The petitioner emphasizes that the purchase certificate is essential for loan purposes and requests disposal within a time frame fixed by the Court.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents acknowledge the desirability of expeditious disposal but stress the need to follow the established seniority-based framework and procedural safeguards. They point to the large pendency (3342 suo motu proceedings) and advocate adherence to the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri; they reference GO 09/2018/RD as enabling support from Village Officers to expedite information flows and urge the Tribunal to dispose of cases in accordance with law without disrupting the established queue.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398/2017PositiveThe judgment in Narayanan Namboodiri provided directives for expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal cases and prioritisation of senior-citizen matters, which the Court applied in directing disposition of S.M.No.29/2019.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Avarankutty v. The Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Palakkad and The Village Officer, Thiruvegapura Village and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 28TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.4129 OF 2021(M)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **AVARANKUTTY, AGED 67 YEARS S/O.SAIDALAVI, KALLIVALAPPIL HOUSE, THIRUVEGAPURA POST, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 304.** **BY ADVS. SRI.R.SREEHARI SHRI.MUHAMMADALI MANEKKATHODI** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** - **1 THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND REFORMS) CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD - 678 014.** - **2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER THIRUVEGAPURA VILLAGE, THIRUVEGAPPURA POST, PATTAMBI TALUK - 679304.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.4129 OF 2021(M) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Deputy Collector (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.29/2019 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Palakkad under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0320 Hectares of land comprised in Sy.No.192/3 in Block No.19 of Thiruvegappura Village in Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.4129 OF 2021(M) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.4129 OF 2021(M) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.4129 OF 2021(M) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.4129 OF 2021(M) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Thiruvegappura Village, the Land Tribunal, Palakkad initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.29/2019, as evidenced by Ext.P3 letter dated 19.01.2019, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 67 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total W.P(C).No.4129 OF 2021(M) -7- pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Palakkad is 3342. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Palakkad can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.29/2019 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of S.M.No.29/2019, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.4129 OF 2021(M) -8- ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 PHOTO COPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 04/11/2017. EXHIBIT P2 PHOTO COPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 18/05/2020. EXHIBIT P3 PHOTO COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19/01/2019 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 PHOTO COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P5 PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.28398/2017 ETC. DATED 14/03/2018. EXHIBIT P6 PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.1134/2021 DATED 18/01/2021.**