Aslam.T.E & M. Koya v. District Collector, Kozhikode and Others
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Gopinath P.
- Judgment Date
- 2023-01-27
- Court Decision / Holding
- Notices issued under the Kerala Highway Protection Act, 1999 (Ext. P2 in WP(C) No. 2464 of 2023 and Ext. P9 in WP(C) No. 464 of 2023) shall be treated as show cause notices. The petitioners shall mark appearance before the 5th respondent at 11.00 AM on 31.01.2023. Thereafter, the 5th respondent shall complete the proceedings after hearing and taking note of objections, and if necessary, after carrying out a measurement of the properties with notices to the petitioners. Further proceedings will be continued against the petitioners only after these proceedings are concluded.
- Final Disposition
- Disposed of with directions
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- ASLAM.T.E
- M. KOYA
Respondents
- DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE
- TAHASILDAR (LAND RECORDS), THAMARASSERY TALUK, KOZHIKODE
- TALUK SURVEYOR, THAMARASSERY TALUK, KOZHIKODE
- VILLAGE OFFICER, NARIKKUNI VILLAGE OFFICE, KOZHIKODE
- EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, KOZHIKODE
- ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS SUB DIVISION, KOZHIKODE
- ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ROADS SECTION OFFICE, NARIKUNNI, KOZHIKODE
- M/S. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • K. Praveen Kumar
- • G. Krishna Kumari
Counsels for Respondents
- • SRI. BIMAL K NATH (SR GP)
Case Synopsis & Summary
The petitions challenge notices issued under the Kerala Highway Protection Act, 1999 directing the petitioners to surrender portions alleged to encroach upon highway puramboke. The petitioners contend they were deprived of an opportunity to be heard before a determination of encroachment, and rely on the court’s prior ruling in Sainudheen A.M. and Another v. District Collector and Others (2020 KHC 2534) to assert their right to appear and object under the Act. The learned Senior Government Pleader concedes that the notices can be treated as show cause notices and proposes that the petitioners be afforded an opportunity to appear before the Executive Engineer, Roads Division, Public Works Department, Kozhikode, who issued the notices, after which the proceedings can be completed after hearing and taking note of objections, and, if necessary, by measurement of the properties. On hearing, the court directs that the notices (Ext.P2 in WP(C) No. 2464 of 2023 and Ext.P9 in WP(C) No. 464 of 2023) be treated as show cause notices and that the petitioners mark appearance before the 5th respondent on 31.01.2023 at 11.00 AM. Proceedings will proceed thereafter after considering objections and any measurements. The matter is disposed with directions for due process in the encroachment proceedings.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
Petitioners contend that they are entitled to notice and hearing before any determination of encroachment under the Kerala Highway Protection Act, 1999; they rely on the decision in Sainudheen A.M. and Another v. District Collector and Others (2020 KHC 2534) to assert their right to appear and object, and seek an opportunity to substantiate that they are not in possession of highway puramboke.
Contentions of Respondents
Respondents submit that the notices can be treated as show cause notices; petitioners can appear before the Executive Engineer, Roads Division, PWD, Kozhikode; after hearing and considering objections (and if necessary, after measurement), the proceedings can be completed.
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sainudheen A.M and Another v. District Collector and Others [2020 KHC 2534] | 2020 KHC 2534 | Positive | Cited as authority that petitioners have a right to appear and object before encroachment determinations under the Kerala Highway Protection Act, 1999. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Aslam.T.E & M. Koya v. District Collector, Kozhikode and Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.