High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions as stated (a)-(e).

Asif .S v Union of India

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) NO. 4787 OF 2024

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Devan Ramachandran
Judgment Date
2024-03-15
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of with directions: (a) Bank to immediately request the Investigation Authority/Police to indicate the amount to be kept frozen in the petitioner’s account, within one month; (b) if a specified amount is mentioned, the freeze will be confined to that amount, allowing the petitioner to operate beyond that limit; (c) if no information is received within two months, the petitioner may transact fully in the account, subject to any future information from the Police; (d) alternatively, if the Police require entire account freeze, the Bank will inform the petitioner and continue the freeze for a further eight months; (e) after eight months, if the requisition is not withdrawn, the petitioner may approach this Court again, with all contentions reserved.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions as stated (a)-(e).

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • ASIF .S

Respondents

  • Union of India represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi, PIN – 110001
  • Reserve Bank of India represented by its General Manager, Branch Office Banerji Road Ernakulam North, Kochi, PIN – 691310
  • The Managing Director, The Federal Bank Limited, Post Box No. 103, Federal Towers, Aluva Ernakulam, PIN – 683101
  • The Manager, Federal Bank, Kazhakuttam Branch, Padmanabhan Building, Kazhakuttam, Thiruvananthapuram, PIN – 695582
  • The Inspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Mira Bhayander Vasai Virar, Thane District, Maharashtra, PIN – 400068

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • ALBIN A. JOSEPH
  • • SUSANTH SHAJI
  • • SIDHARTH O.

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SRI.S.MANU, DSGI
  • • SRI.MOHAN JACOB GEORGE, SC

Case Synopsis & Summary

This is a Kerala High Court writ petition (WP(C) No. 4787 of 2024) filed by Asif .S challenging blanket, indefinite freezing of his bank account in the context of an ongoing investigation. The court recalls its earlier decision in Dr. Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of India (2024 (1) KLT 826) and emphasizes that freezes must be calibrated and linked to specific amounts, to avoid harm to the account holder’s livelihood and to the banking system. The petition highlights that police requisitions in the present case did not specify any amount, seeking a blanket debit freeze of all funds. The court acknowledges that while protecting the investigation, it cannot allow arbitrary deprivation of the petitioner’s economic rights. Following the precedents, the judge proposes a structured mechanism: the bank should request the Investigation Authority/Police to quantify the amount to be frozen; if a particular sum is identified, the freeze will be limited to that amount and the petitioner may operate his account beyond that limit. If no information is received within two months, the petitioner may transact fully, subject to future police information. Alternatively, if the entire account must be frozen, the bank should inform the petitioner and continue the freeze for up to eight months, after which the petitioner may approach this Court again. The petition is disposed with these directions.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that the police requisition to freeze bank accounts contains no specific amount and seeks a blanket debit freeze of all amounts. This denies the account holder’s right to operate accounts and livelihood in an era of heavy banking reliance. Relying on the earlier decision in Dr. Sajeer (supra), the petitioner seeks a limited freeze strictly pegged to the amount required by the investigation, with bank operations allowed for the rest of the balance.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents/petitioners in the police inquiry seek a freeze of funds to preserve the integrity of the investigation. The Bank contends it cannot unconditionally operate accounts when police requisition does not specify an amount, arguing that unbounded freezing would be deleterious to the financial system and account holders. The court emphasizes balancing investigative needs with constitutional rights, following the framework laid down in Dr. Sajeer (supra).

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Dr. Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of India2024 (1) KLT 826PositiveCourt follows and applies the principles and directions from the earlier decision, endorsing a calibrated approach to freezing rather than blanket suspension of account operations.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Asif .S v Union of India and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# `IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM` ## `PRESENT` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 15[TH] DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1945 ``` ## `WP(C) NO. 4787 OF 2024` ## `PETITIONER:` ``` ASIF .S AGED 22 YEARS S/O SAJAD, TC 81/1135(1), PALLINADA VEEDU, POUND KADAVU, VALIYAVELI P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN – 695021. ``` ``` BY ADVS. ALBIN A. JOSEPH SUSANTH SHAJI SIDHARTH O. ``` ## `RESPONDENTS:` ``` 1UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN – 110001. ``` ``` 2RESERVE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS, GENERAL MANAGER BRANCH OFFICE BANERJI ROAD ERNAKULAM NORTH, KOCHI, PIN – 691310. ``` ``` 3THE MANAGING DIRECTOR THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED. POST BOX NO. 103, FEDERAL TOWERS, ALUVA ERNAKULAM, PIN – 683101. ``` ``` 4THE MANAGER FEDERAL BANK, KAZHAKUTTAM BRANCH PADMANANBHAM BUILDING, KAZHAKUTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695582. ``` ``` 5THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING, MIRA BHAYANDER VASAI VIRAR, THANE DISTRICT. MAHARASHTRA, PIN – 400068. ``` ``` BY ADV.SRI.S.MANU, DSGI SRI.MOHAN JACOB GEORGE, SC ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON ``` ``` 15.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 4787 OF 2024 ``` ``` -2- ``` ## `JUDGMENT` ``` In matters relating to the freezing of accounts, this Court has already delivered a judgment inDr.Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of ``` ``` India[2024 (1) KLT 826]. ``` ``` 2.In the aforesaid judgment, certain ``` ``` directions were issued to the respective Banks, as also the Police Authorities, to ``` ``` continue the freeze for a certain period of ``` ``` time and only to the extent which was ``` ``` requisitioned by the Police. ``` ``` 3.However, what makes this case ``` ``` different from the one that was considered by ``` ``` this Court in the aforesaid judgment, is that ``` ``` the requisitions received by the Bank are ``` ``` stated to contain no particular amount, but seek a complete and blanket debit freeze of ``` ## `WP(C) NO. 4787 OF 2024` ``` -3- ``` ``` all the amounts in credit therein. ``` ``` 4.The legal issues and the imperatives ``` ``` involved have already been discussed by this Court in Dr.Sajeer(supra). A blanket freeze indefinitely, and without any period of time being stipulated by the Police, is certainly deleterious, not only to the account holders but also to the system as a whole; and the view in this regard of this Court is clearly ``` ``` reflected in Dr.Sajeer (supra). ``` ``` 5.However, since the Bank is now ``` ``` incapacitated from allowing the operation of the accounts of the petitioner because the ``` ``` requisition issued to them do not contain any particular amount, I am certain that this ``` ``` Court is enjoined to deal with this matter, sufficientlyprotectingboththe ``` ``` investigation, as also the account holders. I ``` ## `WP(C) NO. 4787 OF 2024` ``` -4- ``` ``` am persuaded to such course because, the blanket freeze of an account, if it is not imperatively necessary, will be an affront to the rights of the account holders and ``` ``` impinges even their right to livelihood, ``` ``` since, in this era, everyone relies upon ``` ``` banking transactions as the primary source. ``` ``` In the afore circumstances, following ``` ``` Dr.Sajeer(supra), I dispose of this writ ``` ``` petition with the following directions: ``` ``` (a) The respondent Bank is directed to ``` ``` immediately issue a request to the ``` ``` Investigation Authority/Police Authority and ``` ``` seek the amount which is required to be kept ``` ``` in freeze or held in lien in the account of the petitioner. This shall be done by the Bank within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. ``` ## `WP(C) NO. 4787 OF 2024` ``` -5- ``` ``` (b) In the event that the Investigating Officer/Police Authority responds to the afore requisition and mentions a particular amount, as being the sum that is required to be kept frozen or held in lien, then the ``` ``` respondent Bank will confine the freeze/lien ``` ``` to such an extent and allow the petitioner/account holder to deal with his account and transact therein beyond that limit. ``` ``` (c) On the contrary, if no information is ``` ``` receivedfromthePolice ``` ``` Authority/Investigating officer within a ``` ``` period of two months from the date on which the afore requisition was made by the respondent Bank, then they will allow the petitioner/account holder to transact fully in his account, notwithstanding the debit ``` ## `WP(C) NO. 4787 OF 2024` ``` -6- ``` ``` freeze requisition, subject to any further ``` ``` information to be received from the Police Authority/Investigating Officer in future. ``` - `(d) As an alternative, if the response` ``` from the Police Authority/Investigating ``` ``` Officer is that the entire account be frozen for any reason that is mentioned therein, thentheBankwillinformthe ``` ``` petitioner/account holder accordingly and ``` ``` continue the freeze in such a manner for a ``` ``` further period of eight months thereafter. ``` ``` (e)If, after a period of eight months, ``` ``` the requisition made by the Police ``` ``` Authorities - either to a particular sum or ``` ``` the full amount in the account of the account holder - is not withdrawn, then the ``` ``` petitioner/account holder will be at full liberty to approach this Court again; for ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 4787 OF 2024 ``` ``` -7- which purpose, all contentions in this writ petition are reserved to him to be impelled in future. ``` ``` Sd/- ``` ``` DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN ``` ``` JUDGE ``` ``` akv ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 4787 OF 2024 ``` ``` -8- ``` ## `APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4787/2024` ## `PETITIONER EXHIBITS` |`EXHIBIT-P1`|`TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE `|`NOTICE`| |---|---|---| ||`DATED 15/12/2023 ISSUED BY THE 4TH`|| ||`RESPONDENT REGARDING DIRECTION`|`OF 5TH`| ||`RESPONDENT`|| |`EXHIBIT-P2`|`TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE BALANCE`|| ||`STATEMENT OF THE ACCOUNT OF THE`|| ||`PETITIONER OBTAINED THROUGH `|`MOBILE`| ||`BANKING APPLICATION`|| |`EXHIBIT-P3`|`TRUE`<br>`PHOTOSTAT`<br>`COPY`<br>`OF`|`THE`| ||`REPRESENTATION DATED 25/01/2024`|`ISSUED`| ||`BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD AND 4TH`|| ||`RESPONDENTS`|| |`EXHIBIT-P3(A)`|`TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE `|`POSTAL`| ||`TRACK CONSIGNMENT RECORD DOWNLOADED`|| ||`FROM INDIA POST WEBSITE `|`DATED`| ||`05/02/2024`|| |`EXHIBIT-P4`|`TRUE`<br>`PHOTOSTAT`<br>`COPY`<br>`OF`|`THE`| ||`REPRESENTATION DATED 25/01/2024`|`ISSUED`| ||`BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND`|| ||`RESPONDENT`|| |`EXHIBIT-P4(A)`|`TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE `|`POSTAL`| ||`TRACK CONSIGNMENT RECORD DOWNLOADED`|| ||`FROM INDIA POST WEBSITE `|`DATED`| ||`05/02/2024`||