Arvind Gupta v Union of India and Ors.
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court
- Hon'ble Judges
- R.M. Lodha
- Anil R. Dave
- Judgment Date
- 2012-10-01
- Court Decision / Holding
- Writ Petition dismissed.
- Final Disposition
- Writ Petition dismissed.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Arvind Gupta
Respondents
- Union of India
- Ors.
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Santosh Paul
- • Mohita Bagai
Case Synopsis & Summary
Arvind Gupta v Union of India and Ors concerns the scope and constitutionality of the Comptroller and Auditor General’s power to issue performance audit reports under the Comptroller & Auditor General’s (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971 and the Regulations on Audit and Accounts, 2007 framed thereunder. The petitioner challenged the Regulations as violative of the Constitution, contending that the CAG lacks power to undertake performance audits and that the regulations overstep the statutory authorization. The Court bases its analysis on Articles 149 and 151 of the Constitution, noting that the 1971 Act, including Section 16, assigns to the CAG the duty to audit receipts and to examine whether government resources are used in accordance with established rules and procedures, with the aim of securing an effective check on revenue administration. It held that the function of examining economy, efficiency and effectiveness is inherent in the 1971 Act and that performance audit reports prepared under the Regulations must be viewed in that light; there is no constitutional unconstitutionality in the Regulations. The Court further held that CAG audit reports are subject to scrutiny by Parliament or the State Legislature, as the case may be, through the President or Governor, respectively. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as wholly misconceived. The decision clarifies the constitutional compatibility and accountability framework surrounding CAG performance audits.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioner argued that the CAG has no power to issue performance audit reports and that the Regulations framed under the 1971 Act empowering the CAG to conduct performance audits are violative of the Constitution.
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Arvind Gupta v Union of India and Ors. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.