High CourtDivision BenchWrit Petition dismissed.

Arvind Gupta v Union of India and Ors.

Case / Petition Number:Writ Petition (Civil) No. 393 of 2012
Neutral Citation:[2012] 8 S.C.R. 1058

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Hon'ble Judges
  • R.M. Lodha
  • Anil R. Dave
Judgment Date
2012-10-01
Court Decision / Holding
Writ Petition dismissed.
Final Disposition
Writ Petition dismissed.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Arvind Gupta

Respondents

  • Union of India
  • Ors.

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Santosh Paul
  • • Mohita Bagai

Case Synopsis & Summary

Arvind Gupta v Union of India and Ors concerns the scope and constitutionality of the Comptroller and Auditor General’s power to issue performance audit reports under the Comptroller & Auditor General’s (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971 and the Regulations on Audit and Accounts, 2007 framed thereunder. The petitioner challenged the Regulations as violative of the Constitution, contending that the CAG lacks power to undertake performance audits and that the regulations overstep the statutory authorization. The Court bases its analysis on Articles 149 and 151 of the Constitution, noting that the 1971 Act, including Section 16, assigns to the CAG the duty to audit receipts and to examine whether government resources are used in accordance with established rules and procedures, with the aim of securing an effective check on revenue administration. It held that the function of examining economy, efficiency and effectiveness is inherent in the 1971 Act and that performance audit reports prepared under the Regulations must be viewed in that light; there is no constitutional unconstitutionality in the Regulations. The Court further held that CAG audit reports are subject to scrutiny by Parliament or the State Legislature, as the case may be, through the President or Governor, respectively. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as wholly misconceived. The decision clarifies the constitutional compatibility and accountability framework surrounding CAG performance audits.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 149 of the Constitution of IndiaArticle 151 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 16 of the Comptroller and Auditor General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971Regulations on Audit and Accounts, 2007 framed under the 1971 Act

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner argued that the CAG has no power to issue performance audit reports and that the Regulations framed under the 1971 Act empowering the CAG to conduct performance audits are violative of the Constitution.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Arvind Gupta v Union of India and Ors. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## [2012] 8 S.C.R. 1058 A ## ARVIND GUPTA _v._ UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. (Writ Peition (Civil) No. 393 of 2012) OCTOBER 1, 2012 B ## **[R.M. LODHA AND ANIL R. DAVE, JJ.]** _Comptroller_ & _Auditor General's (Duties, Powers and_ - - _Conditions of Services) Act, 1971 s.16 Regulations on_ C _Audit and Accounts, 2007 framed under the 1971 Act- Power of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (GAG) to give_ - _performance audit report Regulations framed under the 1971 Act empowering the GAG to conduct petiormance audit_ - _If violative of the Constitution_ - _Held: CA G's function to carry out examinations into economy, efficiency and effectiveness_ D _with which Government has used its resources is inbuilt in the_ - _1971 Act Petiormance audit reports prepared under the_ - _Regulations have to be viewed accordingly No_ - _unconstitutionality in the Regulations More-over, Audit reports submitted by GAG are subject to scrutiny by the_ E _Parliament or the Legislature of the State, as the case may_ - - _be Constitution of India, 1950 Articles 149 and 151._ CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 393 of 2012. F Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. Santosh Pual, Mohita Bagai (for Harish Pandey) for the Petitioner. The following Order of the Court was delivered by ## **ORDER** G 1. We have heard Mr. Santosh Paul, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has no power to give performance audit report and the Regulations on Audit H 1058 1059 ARVIND GUPTA _v._ UNION OF !NOIA and Accounts, 2007 (for short "Regulations") framed under the Comptroller & Auditor General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Services) Act, 1971 (for short "1971 Act") empowering the CAG to conduct performance audit are violative of the Constitution. A 3. Article 149 of the Constitution of India provides that B CAG shall perform such duties and exercise such powers in relation to the accounts of the Union and of the States and of any other authority or body as may be prescribed by or under any law made by Parliament. In pursuance of Article 149 of the Constitution, 1971 Act has been enacted. Amongst other c provisions in 1971 Act, Section 16 provides that it shall be the duty of the CAG to audit all receipts which are payable into the Consolidated Fund of India and of each State and of each Union Territory having a Legislative Assembly and to satisfy himself that the rules and procedures in that behalf are 0 designed to secure an effective check on the assessment, collection and proper allocation of revenue and are being duly observed and for this purpose make such examination of the accounts as he thinks fit and report thereon. · 4. CAG's function to carry out examinations into economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which Government has used its resources is inbuilt in the 1971 Act. Performance audit reports prepared under the Regulations have to be viewed accordingly. We find no unconstitutionality in the Regulations. More-over Article 151 of the Constitution provides that the reports of CAG relating to the accounts of the Union shall be submitted to the President, who shall cause them to be laid before each House of Parliament and the reports relating to the accounts of a State shall be submitted to the Governor of the State who shall cause them to be laid before the Legislature of the State. The audit reports, which are submitted by CAG are, thus, subject to scrutiny by the Parliament or the Legislature of the State, as the case may be. 5. Writ Petition is wholly misconceived and is dismissed accordingly. Writ Petition dismissed. B.B.B. E F G H