High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of with directions to re...

ARUN FRANCIS S/O FRANCIS et al. v. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY THRISSUR & OTHERS

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No. 12008 of 2017 (A)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • P. B. Suresh Kumar
Judgment Date
2017-04-05
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the petitioners to file fresh applications in the prescribed form for variation of halting places, along with the prescribed fees, within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The first respondent shall consider the refiled applications on merits in light of the Rajesh v. Secretary, R.T.A. decision (supra) within one week thereafter.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with directions to refile and consider the applications in light of Rajesh v. Secretary, R.T.A.; timely processing within specified deadlines.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • ARUN FRANCIS S/O FRANCIS
  • SEENA BABU
  • JIS PAUL
  • RAJU MAMBULLY
  • SREEJITH S. THALAPPILLY
  • SOBHANA K. KUNNAMKAVIL
  • BIJU P.C.
  • PRASANTH A.D.
  • K.I.BAIJU
  • JOY P.P. PARANGADAN
  • AKHIL C.P. CHEERAKUZHI
  • SUDHEESH N.C.
  • BEENA V.V.
  • BIJITH THARAYIL
  • SILJI DEVASSY K. KANNAMPUZHA IKRAN
  • SHYAM MAKKAL
  • KRISHNALAL KOLANGAT
  • LEKHA SREE RAMA VILASAM
  • LIBIN A.P.
  • P.K.SREEDEVI
  • RENJITH AMBAKKATT
  • BENNY K.P.
  • RAHUL MUNNEKKATTIL
  • AKHILA KOMARATH
  • RATHEESH
  • MANOJ
  • JITH K.J.
  • JIMMY
  • JINO
  • SARADA
  • LIJO A.J.
  • PRASAD
  • VINCENT P.K. PERUMADAN

Respondents

  • REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY THRISSUR - 680609, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY
  • THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR - 680609
  • THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER THRISSUR-680609
  • THE THRISSUR CORPORATION THRISSUR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 680020
  • THE SECRETARY THRISSUR CORPORATION, M.O.ROAD, THRISSUR - 680020

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • P.K. ANIL

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt.C.S.SHEEJA
  • • Sri.Santhosh P. Poduval (SC)

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioners are autorickshaw operators in Thrissur district who sought variation of the halting place mentioned in their vehicle permits. They filed WP(C) No.12008 of 2017 (A) seeking directions to the first respondent to accept Exts.P34 to P66, i.e., their applications for variation of halting places, and to dispose of them in light of a controlling precedent. They contended that the decision in Rajesh v. Secretary, R.T.A. (2014 (3) KLT 341) dealt with a nearly identical grievance and should guide the disposition of their applications. The court heard the petitioners’ counsel and the Government Pleader and noted Rajesh as the controlling authority, which had permitted the petitioners to refile in prescribed form with the requisite fees. The judgment disposes of the petition by directing that the petitioners may preferred applications anew in the prescribed form within one week from receipt of a copy of the judgment, with the prescribed fee, and that the first respondent shall consider these refiled applications on merits in light of Rajesh within a further week. The order emphasizes processing and merits evaluation rather than a substantive redefinition of halting places, effectively allowing a fresh filing under Rajesh’s framework and directing timely consideration by the RTA.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contended that they are entitled to have their applications for variation of halting places considered, citing the decision in Rajesh v. Secretary, R.T.A. as a controlling precedent. They argued that the first respondent should accept Exts.P34 to P66 and dispose of the matters in light of Rajesh, including payment of prescribed fees, and proceed to decide the merits promptly.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents’ specific arguments are not elaborated in the provided text; the court’s order indicates adherence to the Rajesh decision as the guiding framework for processing the applications and directing timely consideration.

Cited Precedents (4)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Rajesh v. Secretary, R.T.A.2014 (3) KLT 341PositiveThe judgment expressly states that the relief is to be guided by the Rajesh decision, and directs processing of the petitions in conformity with that precedent.
State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Ernakulam in MVAA 417/2011MVAA 417/2011Mentioned OnlyExhibited as part of the record; not discussed or relied upon in the judgment.
W.P.(C) No.20209/15—Mentioned OnlyExhibited as a prior judgment; not elaborated in the decision.
WP(C) 15267/16—Mentioned OnlyExhibited as a prior judgment; not elaborated in the decision.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against ARUN FRANCIS S/O FRANCIS et al. v. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY THRISSUR & OTHERS and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT:** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR** ## **WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/15TH CHAITHRA, 1939** ## **WP(C).No. 12008 of 2017 (A)** **----------------------------** ## **PETITIONER(S):** - **-------------** **1. ARUN FRANCIS S/O.FRANCIS, AGED 24 YEARS, MADATHIL PARAMBIL HOUSE, NEW GENERATION LANE, VELUTHUR VILLAGE, PARAKKAD P.O., TRICHUR.** **2. SEENA BABU** - **ACHATH HOUSE, NETTISSERY P.O., MADAKKATHARA, TRICHUR.** **3. JIS PAUL** - **CHIRAMMEL HOUSE, OLARIKKARA P.O., PULLAZHY, TRICHUR.** **4. RAJU MAMBULLY HOUSE, ASSARIMOOLA, MANAKKODY P.O., TRICHUR.** **5. SREEJITH S. THALAPPILLY HOUSE, VYLOPPILLY NAGAR,** - **2ND STREET, NALLENKARA EAST FORT P.O., TRICHUR.** **6. SOBHANA K. KUNNAMKAVIL HOUSE, PLAKKAT LANE, TRICHUR P.O., TRICHUR.** **7. BIJU P.C. PULPARAMBIL HOUSE, TRICHUR P.O. TRICHUR.** **8. PRASANTH A.D.** - **ALUKKAL HOUSE, KIZHAKKEPURAM, ARANATTUKARA P.O., TRICHUR.** **9. K.I.BAIJU KUTTIKKAT HOUSE, ELTHURUTH P.O., TRICHUR.** ## **10. JOY P.P. PARANGADAN HOUSE, ANCHERY P.O., TRICHUR.** **11. AKHIL C.P. CHEERAKUZHI HOUSE, MARATHAKAM ROAD, PURANATTUKARA P.O., TRICHUR.** ## **WP(C).No. 12008 of 2017 (A)** ## **----------------------------** **12. SUDHEESH N.C. NELLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VELUMANPADI, CHAZHOOR P.O., TRICHUR.** **13. BEENA V.V.** - **THETTILA HOUSE, PERUNGOTTUKARA P.O., TRICHUR.** **14. BIJITH THARAYIL HOUSE, KANIMANGALAM P.O., TRICHUR.** **15. SILJI DEVASSY K. KANNAMPUZHA IKRAN HOUSE, PALAT HILL, OLLUR P.O., TRICHUR.** **16. SHYAM MAKKAL HOUSE, AYYANTHOLE P.O., TRICHUR.** **17. KRISHNALAL KOLANGAT HOUSE, PUTHOORKARA, AYYANTHOLE P.O., TRICHUR.** **18. LEKHA SREE RAMA VILASAM, PANCHIKKAL LANE, AYYANTHOLE P.O., TRICHUR.** **19. LIBIN A.P.** - **ALAPPAT HOUSE, KUTTUR P.O., TRICHUR.** **20. P.K.SREEDEVI** - **PUTHUPURA HOUSE, PULLAZHI P.O., TRICHUR.** **21. RENJITH AMBAKKATT HOUSE, TRICHUR P.O., TRICHUR.** **22. BENNY K.P. 6/803, KUMUMATTAM HOUSE, OLLUKKARA P.O., TRICHUR.** **23. RAHUL MUNNEKKATTIL HOUSE, CHETTUPUZHA P.O., MANAKODY, TRICHUR.** **24. AKHILA KOMARATH HOUSE, PULLAZHI P.O., TRICHUR.** **25. RATHEESH** - **4/355, MUTTISSERY HOUSE, ARIMPOOR P.O., TRICHUR.** **26. MANOJ 6/57, EDATHARA HOUSE, CHETTUPUZHA P.O., TRICHUR.** ## **WP(C).No. 12008 of 2017 (A)** ## **----------------------------** **27. JITH K.J. 8/287,KUNDUKULANGARA HOUSE, MULLAKKARA P.O., TRICHUR.** **28. JIMMY** - **PULIMALAYIL HOUSE, CHENNAIPARA P.O., TRICHUR.** **29. JINO 7/466, PULIMALAYIL HOUSE, PUTHUR, CHENNAIPARA P.O., TRICHUR.** **30. SARADA** - **MELEPARAMBIL HOUSE, THRIKUMARAKUDAM COLONY, AYYANTHOLE P.O., TRICHUR.** **31. LIJO A.J. ARAKKAL HOUSE, PONNUKKARA P.O., PUTHUR, TRICHUR.** **32. PRASAD** ## **THOTTUNGAL HOUSE, CHEROOR P.O., TRICHUR.** **33. VINCENT P.K. PERUMADAN HOUSE, NEAR MISSION HOME, ANCHERY P.O., MARIAPURAM, TRICHUR.** ## **BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL** ## **RESPONDENT(S):** ## **--------------** **1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY THRISSUR - 680609, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY.** **2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR - 680609.** **3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER THRISSUR-680609.** **4. THE THRISSUR CORPORATION THRISSUR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 680020.** **5. THE SECRETARY THRISSUR CORPORATION, M.O.ROAD, THRISSUR - 680020.** - **R4&R5 BY STI. SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL, SC, THRISSUR CORPORATION BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.S.SHEEJA** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-04-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** ## **WP(C).No. 12008 of 2017 (A)** **----------------------------** ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS -----------------------** - **EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER NO.1. EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER NO.2. EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER NO.3. EXHIBIT-P4: TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER NO.4. EXHIBIT-P5: TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD OF THE 5TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P6: TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD OF THE 6TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P7: TRUE COPY OF THE DRIVING LICENCE OF THE 7TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P8: TRUE COPY OF THE DRIVING LICENCE OF THE 8TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P9: TRUE COPY OF THE DRIVING LICENCE OF THE 9TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P10: TRUE COPY OF THE DRIVING LICENCE OF THE 10TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P11: TRUE COPY OF THE DRIVING LICENCE OF THE 11TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P12: TRUE COPY OF THE DRIVING LICENCE OF THE 12TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P13: TRUE COPY OF THE DRIVING LICENCE OF THE 13TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P14: TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION IDENTITY CARD OF THE 14TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P15: TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION IDENTITY CARD OF THE 15TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P16: TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION IDENTITY CARD OF THE 16TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P17: TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION IDENTITY CARD OF THE 17TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P18: TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION IDENTITY CARD OF THE 18TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P19: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 19TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P19(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 19TH PETITIONER.** ## **WP(C).No. 12008 of 2017 (A)** ## **----------------------------** **EXHIBIT-P20: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 20TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P20(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 20TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P21: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 21ST PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P21(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 21ST PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P22: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 22ND PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P22(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 22ND PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P23: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 23RD PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P23(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 23RD PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P24: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 24TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P24(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 24TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P25: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 25TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P25A: TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 25TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P26: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 26TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P26(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 26TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P27: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 27TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P27(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 27TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P28: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 28TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P28(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 28TH PETITIONER.** ## **WP(C).No. 12008 of 2017 (A)** **----------------------------** **EXHIBIT-P29: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 29TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P29(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 29TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P30: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 30TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P30(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 30TH PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P31: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 31ST PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P31(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 31ST PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P32: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 32ND PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P32(A):TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 32ND PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P33: TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 33RD PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT-P34: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.1 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P35: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.2 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P36: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.3 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P37: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.4 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P38: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.5 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P39: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.6 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P40: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.7 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P41: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.8 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P42: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.9 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** ## **WP(C).No. 12008 of 2017 (A)** **----------------------------** - **EXHIBIT-P43: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.10 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P44: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.11 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P45: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.12 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P46: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.13 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P47: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.14 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P48: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.15 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P49: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.16 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P50: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.17 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P51: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.18 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P52: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.19 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P53: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.20 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P54: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.21 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT-P55: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.22.** - **EXHIBIT-P56: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.23.** - **EXHIBIT-P57: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.24.** - **EXHIBIT-P58: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.25.** - **EXHIBIT-P59: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.26.** - **EXHIBIT-P60: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.27.** ## **WP(C).No. 12008 of 2017 (A)** ## **----------------------------** - **EXHIBIT-P61: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.28.** - **EXHIBIT-P62: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.29.** - **EXHIBIT-P63: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.30.** - **EXHIBIT-P64: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.31.** - **EXHIBIT-P65: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.32.** - **EXHIBIT-P66: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.33.** - **EXHIBIT-P67: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM IN MVAA 417/2011.** - **EXHIBIT-P68: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.20209/15 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.** - **EXHIBIT-P69: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 15267/16 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.** **RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL** **-----------------------** ## **//TRUE COPY//** **P.A. TO JUDGE** **dlk** ## **P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.** **.......................................** ## **W.P.(C) No. 12008 of 2017 (A)** **................................................** ## **Dated this the 5[th] day of April, 2017** ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioners are plying autorikshaws in Thrissur district. They submitted Exts.P34 to P66 applications before the first respondent for variation of the halting place mentioned in their permits. The grievance of the petitioners is that the first respondent is not accepting the said applications. The petitioners seek directions to the first respondent to accept Exts.P34 to P66 applications and dispose of the same in the light of the decision of this Court in **Rajesh** v. **Secretary, R.T.A.** (2014 (3) KLT 341). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned Government Pleader. 3. It is seen that **Rajesh** v. **Secretary, R.T.A.** ( _supra_ ) is a case wherein this Court had dealt with the grievance identical to the grievance of the petitioners herein. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioners to prefer applications again in the W.P.(C) No. 12008 of 2017 (A) 2 prescribed form for the said purpose along with the fees payable for the same. If the applications as directed above are submitted by the petitioners within a week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, with the prescribed fee, the first respondent shall consider the same on merits, in the light of the decision in **Rajesh v. Secretary, R.T.A.** ( _supra_ ) within a week thereafter. Sd/- **P.B.SURESH KUMAR JUDGE** AMV/07/04/2017