Annamanada Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and Income Tax Officer, Ward (2), Thrissur
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- N. Nagareesh
- Judgment Date
- 2019-09-17
- Court Decision / Holding
- disposed of with directions: to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 appeals expeditiously and to refrain from coercive steps against the petitioner-bank till the appeals are disposed of.
- Final Disposition
- Disposed of
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Annamanada Service Co-Operative Bank Limited No.159, Annamanada, Chalakudy Taluk, Thrissur District, represented by its Secretary
Respondents
- Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Ayakar Bhavan, Shaktan Nagar, Thrissur, Pin-680 001
- Income Tax Officer, Ward (2), Shaktan Nagar, Thrissur, Pin-680 001
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Sri. O.D. Sivadas
Counsels for Respondents
- • Sri. Jose Joseph – Standing Counsel
Case Synopsis & Summary
These writ petitions challenge income tax assessments issued for the years 2009-10, 2010-11, 2015-16 and 2016-17 against Annamanada Service Co-operative Bank Limited and the consequent notices under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act seeking recovery. The petitioner bank, registered under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, submits that, in similar circumstances, the Kerala High Court has directed that appellate authority consider the bank’s statutory appeals before any coercive recovery action is taken and pending disposal of the appeals. In support of this position, the petitions cite decisions in W.P.(C) No.13364/2019 and W.A. No.1529/2019, as well as the Full Bench decision in The Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut (2019 (2) KHC 287). After hearing counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel for the Department, the Court finds merit in adopting a similar approach. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the 1st Respondent – Appellate Authority to consider and pass appropriate orders on the Ext.P2 appeals as expeditiously as possible, and to refrain from any coercive steps against the petitioner Bank pending disposal of the appeals. The decision aligns with the aim of ensuring timely adjudication of appeals without coercive recovery during pendency. The order reflects a consistent pattern of safeguarding the petitioner's rights while expediting appellate consideration.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioner-bank contends that in identical cases the court has directed the appellate authority to consider the bank's statutory appeals first and not to resort to coercive recovery steps pending disposal of the appeals; cites W.P.(C) No.13364/2019 and W.A. No.1529/2019 as supportive precedents and relies on the Full Bench decision in The Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut (2019 (2) KHC 287).
Contentions of Respondents
Not stated in the provided excerpt.
Cited Precedents (3)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut | 2019 (2) KHC 287 | Positive | Noted and relied upon as controlling or persuasive authority to direct appellate consideration before coercive recovery, informing the court's disposition. |
| W.P.(C) No.13364/2019 | W.P.(C). No.13364/2019 | Positive | Identical case cited where court directed appellate consideration prior to coercive steps. |
| W.A. No.1529/2019 | W.A. No.1529/2019 | Positive | Division Bench decision directing prompt disposal of statutory appeals taking note of the Full Bench decision. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Annamanada Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and Income Tax Officer, Ward (2), Thrissur and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.