High Court of KeralaDivision BenchDisposed of with directions

Angels Nair v. Union of India & Others

Case / Petition Number:WA 1311/2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • A. Muhammed Mustaque
  • Shoba Annamma Eapen
Judgment Date
2024-01-05
Court Decision / Holding
The WA is disposed of with a direction that forest officials must strictly follow the NTCA SOP and the Wildlife Protection Act while dealing with wild animals in human habitats, and to use Section 144 Cr.P.C to maintain law and order when needed; no interference with the learned Single Judge's order.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Angels Nair

Respondents

  • Union of India
  • Director Wildlife Crime Control Bureau
  • The State of Kerala
  • Chief Wildlife Warden, Forest Headquarters

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Angels Nair (Petitioner-in-person)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri. T.P. Sajan – SPL.GOVT.PLEADER (FOREST)

Case Synopsis & Summary

This intra-court appeal challenges the 22.03.2023 judgment of a learned Single Judge in WP(C) 4366 of 2022. The appellant, Angels Nair, General Secretary of the NGO Animal Legal Force Integration, contends that forest officials violated the NTCA SOP and the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 when two leopard cubs were removed from an uninhabited house in Ummini, Palakkad district and were not reunified with their mother. It is alleged that video footage showed non-uniform personnel taking the cubs in a used cardboard box, raising concerns that the animals were being displayed rather than protected. The Single Judge had accepted that the cubs were removed to safeguard them from immediate danger given the ground situation, and that the leopard later returned with one cub, suggesting the threat had subsided. In the appeal, the respondents submit that the actions were necessary to prevent harm, there was no straying of the leopard into the human habitat, and every effort was made to reunite the cubs with the mother, with adherence to SOPs and training. The Kerala High Court, while not altering the essential finding, directs that those dealing with wild animals must strictly follow the NTCA SOP and the Wildlife Protection Act when animals stray into human habitations. The judgment further directs adherence to Section 144 Cr.P.C to maintain order and avoid crowding, and it closes the appeal with these directions for future practice.

Provisions of Law Cited

Wildlife Protection Act, 1972Section 144 Cr.P.C.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The appellant contends that forest officials removed the cubs in violation of the NTCA SOP and the Wildlife Protection Act, with non-uniform personnel taking the cubs in a cardboard box; there was no reunification with the mother; alleges there was an intent to display the cubs in a zoological setting; seeks strict adherence to SOP and accountability for deviations.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend that the removal was a necessary safety measure to prevent harm, there was no straying of the leopard into a human habitat, and every effort was made to reunite the cubs with the mother; actions were in line with the SOP provisions, and all protocols and training were followed; after 10.02.2022 no straying was reported.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Angels Nair v. Union of India & Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE** ## **&** **THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN FRIDAY, THE 5[TH] DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 15TH POUSHA, 1945 WA NO. 1311 OF 2023** **JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 4366/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA** ## **APPELLANT/PETITIONER:** ANGELS NAIR, AGED 55 YEARS GEN SECRETARY,ANIMAL LEGAL FORCE INTEGRATION, KAPPILLIL HOUSE, PULLUVAZHI P. O., PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKUKLAM DT., PIN - 683541 BY ADV ANGELS NAIR,(Party-In-Person) ## **- RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 4 IN WP(C):** 1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE, C.G.O COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, PARYAVARAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI - 110003 E-MAIL:SECY-MOEF@NIC.IN, PIN - 110003 2 THE DIRECTOR WILDLIFE CRIME CONTROL BUREAU IIND FLOOR, TRIKOOT-1 BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE, NEW DELHI -110066 E-MAIL:PRLSECY.FOREST@KERALA.GOV.IN, PIN - 110066 3 THE STATE OF KERALA THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOREST & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001, PIN - 695001 4 CHIEF WILDLIFE WARDEN, WA No.1311/2023 **==> picture [31 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** FOREST HEADQUARTERS, VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695014 BY SRI.T.P.SAJAN – SPL.GOVT.PLEADER (FOREST) THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.12.2023, THE COURT ON 05.01.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WA No.1311/2023 ..3.. ## **JUDGMENT** ## SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J. This intra court appeal is filed by the petitioner in WP(C) No.4366 of 2022 challenging judgment dated 22.03.2023 of the learned Single Judge. 2. The appellant is the General Secretary of the NGO, “Animal Legal Force Integration”, and is an animal lover. Ext.P1 newspaper report dated 21.01.2022 under the caption “Get nod to shoot leopard if needed” prompted the appellant/petitioner to file the writ petition. A mother leopard delivered two cubs inside an uninhabited house in Ummini Village in Akathethara Panchayat in Palakkad District. It is alleged that on getting information on 09.01.2022, the forest officials immediately took away the cubs in violation of the Standard WA No.1311/2023 **==> picture [31 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** Operating Procedure (SOP) issued by the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA), to the Divisional Forest Office at Palakkad. It is further alleged that video footage was circulating in the social media that four people not in uniform came with a used cardboard box, picked up the two cubs with bare hands and rushed out hurriedly. According to the appellant, since the forest officials took away the cubs, the mother leopard was causing threat to the villagers in search of the cubs. After consideration of the issue, the learned Single Judge found that the cubs were removed from the spot since the ground situation warranted such action on the apprehension that the cubs would be harmed by the people assembled at the spot. It was observed that attempts were made to save the lives of the cubs and the materials do not indicate that the officials have committed hunting or any other offence under the Wildlife WA No.1311/2023 **==> picture [31 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** (Protection) Act, 1972 (for short, “the Act”) and that the apprehension that the leopard would be shot does not subsist since the leopard returned to its natural environment with one of its cubs. Accordingly, the writ petition was closed, noting that nothing survives for consideration. Aggrieved by this, the writ petitioner has come up in appeal. 3. Heard Sri.Angelsnair, the appellant/ petitioner, who appeared in person; and Sri.T.P.Sajan, learned Special Government Pleader (Forest). 4. In appeal, the apprehension raised by the appellant is that the Forest Department snatched away the two cubs by violating the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) issued by the NTCA and the Act. It is also alleged that no attempt has been made to reunite the cubs with the mother leopard and that the intention of the department WA No.1311/2023 **==> picture [31 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** was to kidnap and display the cubs as show piece in the newly constructed zoological park. 5. The relevant portion of SOP issued by the NTCA reads as follows; “Suggested field actions to deal with strayed wild carnivores (tiger/leopard) (a) At the outset, constitute a Committee immediately for technical guidance and monitoring on day to day basis, as under:- i. a nominee of the Chief Wildlife Warden ii. A nominee of the National Tiger Conservation Authority. iii. A veterinarian iv. Local NGO representative v. A representative of local panchayat vi. Field Director/Protected Area Manager/DFO I/C-Chariman (h) Create “Pressure Impression Pads, (PIP's) in the area to ascertain the daily movement of the animal, while plotting the same on a map. Proactively involve District Collector/DM and SSP/SP pf the area to maintain law and order in the area, besides avoiding crowding by local mobs. Acquaint them with human-tiger conflict issues and guidelines of the NTCA to deal with the situation. WA No.1311/2023 **==> picture [31 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** (j) In all instances of wild carnivores like tiger/leopard straying into a human dominated landscape, the district authorities need to ensure law and order by imposing section 144 Cr.PC. This is essential to avoid agitation/excited local people surrounding the animal spot which hampers capture operation, leading to serious injuries on people and staff. It is also necessary that police and local administration be involved at an early stage. Effective coordination with them is critical to control mobs which has been seen several instances, worsen the situation and lead to avoidable fatalities/tragedies.” 6. When this case came up on 25.09.2023, this Court directed the competent officials to file an affidavit as to whether the forest officials have been sensitised and whether SOP is being followed by the officials or not. Pursuant to the direction of this Court, the fourth respondent filed an affidavit, stating that two newborn leopard cubs were found in an unoccupied building in human habitations in Pappadi area of Ummini under the jurisdiction of Walayar Forest Range, an area very near to the forest. The cubs WA No.1311/2023 **==> picture [31 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** were not orphaned or abandoned, but under mother care. Since people spotted the location, the mother leopard got disturbed and moved away and despite thoroughly searching the area, no presence of the mother leopard could be traced out. It is stated that there was neither straying of leopard in the human habitat in the nearby area nor any emergent situation. Hence, according to the respondents, there was no occasion to take steps as provided in the SOP for dealing with straying in the human habitat. It was further stated that since there was presence of local people at large in the area where the cubs were found, it was necessary to safeguard the cubs avoiding stress in the presence of the crowd and accordingly, the cubs were shifted to transit care for medical and allied attention. According to the respondents, they have put in relentless efforts to get the mother leopard to reunite with the cubs and in the process, one of the cubs was WA No.1311/2023 **==> picture [31 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** reunited with the mother, however, even after repeated attempts, the second cub was found to be weak and unhealthy and though it was transferred to transit care and was given all the medical care under the experts, it was succumbed to death after 56 days of rescue. It is stated that though there was no separate SOP available for rescuing leopard cubs, all standard protocols in handling wild animals, medical care, diet etc. were followed under the strict supervision of experts as is evident from the Enquiry Report submitted by the Chief Conservator of Forests & Field Director, Palakkad, based on the enquiry conducted as per proceedings dated 18.05.2022. It is further stated that as part of induction training, all the field staff up to senior forest officers were given training on rescue, handling and rehabilitation of wild animals including exposure on all the procedures and the SOP followed in the field. According to the WA No.1311/2023 **==> picture [37 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** respondents, after obtaining a photo of the mother leopard taking one of the cubs on 10.02.2022, there was no report regarding the mother leopard coming to the area or straying in the human habitat and hence, there was no occasion for following the SOP. 7. On going through the entire averments raised on both sides, it is seen that the issue arose when the mother leopard delivered two cubs in an uninhabited house in Ummini Village in Akathethara Panchayat in Palakkad District and there was interference of local people. On information, the forest officials removed the cubs immediately for keeping them safe for the time being and thereafter, possible steps were seen taken by the officials for uniting the cubs with the mother leopard. However, records reveal that one of the cubs, which was found healthy, was taken by the mother leopard, and the other one, which was found unhealthy, succumbed to WA No.1311/2023 **==> picture [37 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** death after 56 days of rescue. The petitioner could not produce any material to show that the respondents have not taken proper care of the cubs or have violated the protocol. As per the statement filed by the forest officials, all attempts were made to save the lives of the leapord cubs. It is further stated that as part of induction training, all field staff up to senior forest officers were given hands-on training on rescue, handling and rehabilitation of wild animals including exposure on all the procedures and SOP followed in the field. The relevant portion of the SOP extracted above suggests field actions to deal with strayed wild carnivores (tiger/leopard). According to the respondents, no straying of tiger or leopard in the human habitat was reported after 10.02.2022 and so, there was no occasion to follow the SOP. 8. The learned Single Judge has considered the entire matter in detail and we do not find WA No.1311/2023 **==> picture [37 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. However, we are of the view that while dealing with wild animals, the forest officials have to be keen in following the SOP. Therefore, the writ appeal is disposed of with a direction that henceforth, while dealing with wild animals, the forest officials have to be keen in following Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) issued by the NTCA and the Act strictly, if found straying in the human habitat. ## **Sd/-** ## **A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE** ## **JUDGE** **Sd/-** **SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE** bka/- WA No.1311/2023 ..13.. ## **APPENDIX OF WA 1311/2023** RESPONDENT ANNEXURES Annexure R4(a) A true copy of the Standard Operating Procedure for dealing with Tigers in human dominated landscape annexure R4(b) A true copy of the Standard Operating Procedure for dealing with orphaned/abandoned tiger cubs and old injured tigers in the wild