High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeFIR and all proceedings quashed; case disposed of.

Aneez Ahammed.T.A and others v. State of Kerala and others

Case / Petition Number:Crl.M.C.No.8107/2019

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ALEXANDER THOMAS
Judgment Date
2019-11-18
Court Decision / Holding
The petition is allowed; the impugned FIR No.216/2014 and the connected proceedings in CC No.1228/2014 are quashed. The case stands disposed of in the interest of justice. The petitioners are to supply certified copies of the order to the IO and the lower court; the AG’s office will communicate the order to the IO for necessary action.
Final Disposition
FIR and all proceedings quashed; case disposed of.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • ANEEZ AHAMMED.T.A
  • ANSARI.S
  • MAJO.C.J
  • RIJO DOMY
  • FARSANA
  • ARUNASREE.K.R
  • NIDHIN.K.A
  • DIJOHNS VARGHESE
  • SREERAJ M.D
  • SAYOOJ K.C
  • ABIJITH K.N
  • SHIBU DHAMODARAN
  • RIYAS E.R
  • MANU MOHAN
  • ZAFDHAR SHEREEF
  • HASEENA.A
  • N.S.HASNA MOL

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam
  • Station House Officer, Thrissur Town West Police Station
  • Silpa (defacto complainant)
  • Arsha Dharmapalan
  • Niji S.

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. Archana Mithran O.K.

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Adv. Tinu Johnson (for respondents 3–5)
  • • Sri. Santhosh Peter, Public Prosecutor (for State)

Case Synopsis & Summary

This is a criminal miscellaneous petition (Crl.M.C. No.8107/2019) filed in the Kerala High Court by 17 petitioners who are accused in FIR No.216/2014 registered at Thrissur Town West Police Station, leading to CC No.1228/2014 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate’s Court-II, Thrissur. The petition seeks quashment of the impugned proceedings under Sec.482 Cr.P.C., contending that the disputes between the petitioners and the de facto complainants (respondents 3–5) have been amicably settled. The respondents 3–5 have sworn affidavits before the court (Annexures A3–A5) stating that the entire disputes have been resolved and they have no objection to quashment. The High Court recalls that the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that it can quash prosecutions in appropriate cases under Sec.482 Cr.P.C. even for non-compoundable offences when settlement is genuine and continuing the prosecution serves no purpose, citing Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Narinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab. After examining the materials, the affidavits, and the settlement, the court holds that continuing the proceedings would unnecessarily waste judicial time, and that the ends of justice require quashing of the FIR (Crime No.216/2014) and all connected proceedings (CC No.1228/2014). The order directs the parties to furnish certified copies to the IO and the lower court, and accordingly disposes of the petition.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 143 IPCSection 147 IPCSection 294(b) IPCSection 341 IPCSection 506(ii) IPC read with Section 149 IPCSection 482 Cr.P.C.

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • High Court power to quash criminal proceedings under Sec.482 Cr.P.C. in appropriate cases where the parties have settled and continuing prosecution would not serve the ends of justice.
  • Principles from Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466 (para 29) supporting quashment on settlement in non-compoundable offences.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contend that the dispute with the respondents has been amicably settled and that continuance of prosecution does not serve any purpose. They rely on the affidavits of settlement (Annexures A3–A5) sworn by the de facto complainants and on the legal principles laid down in Gian Singh and Narinder Singh to seek quashment under Sec.482 Cr.P.C. given the ends of justice.

Contentions of Respondents

Not expressly stated in detail in the order. The document indicates the respondents support quashment in light of the settlement, with counsel appearing for respondents 3–5 (Adv. Tinu Johnson) and the Public Prosecutor representing the State.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab2013 (1) SCC (Cri) 160PositiveThe court relied on Gian Singh to permit quashing when disputes are settled and continuing prosecution would not serve ends of justice.
Narinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and anr2014 (6) SCC 466PositiveCited group of decisions and para 29 supporting quashment where settlement exists and ends of justice require it.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Aneez Ahammed.T.A and others v. State of Kerala and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS** **MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 27TH KARTHIKA, 1941** ## **Crl.MC.No.8107 OF 2019(C)** **AGAINST CC 1228/2014 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, THRISSUR** **CRIME NO.216/2014 OF Town West Police Station, Thrissur** ## **PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 17:** |**1**|**ANEEZ AHAMMED.T.A**| |---|---| ||**AGED 24 YEARS, S/O ABBAS.T.M,**| ||**THERIL HOUSE,**| ||**OLLUKARA VILLAGE,**| ||**THRISSUR TALUK,**| ||**PATTIKAD.P.O,PIN-680562.**| |**2**|**ANSARI.S,**| ||**AGED 25 YEARS, S/O SALAHUDEEN,**| ||**SANA ZMANZIL,**| ||**THAZHATHALA VILLAGE,KOLLAM TALUK,**| ||**UMAYANALLOOR, PIN-691589.**| |**3**|**MAJO.C.J,**| ||**AGED 25 YEARS, S/O JOHNY.T.C,**| ||**CHITTILAPPILLY HOUSE,**| ||**ADZAT VILLAGE,**| ||**THRISSUR TALUK, PIN-680551.**| |**4**|**RIJO DOMY,**| ||**AGED 25 YEARS, S/O DOMY KURIAKOSE,**| ||**PLACKAL HOUSE,**| ||**ENANALLOOR VILLAGE,MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK,**| ||**KAVAKKAD.P.O,PIN-686668.**| **-:2:-** Crl.M.C. 8107/19 - **5 FARSANA, AGED 27 YEARS, D/O HABEEB, ORKARISSERIL HOUSE, PATHIYUR VILLAGE,KARTHIKAPPALLI TALUK, KAYAMKULAM.P.O,PIN-690502.** - **6 ARUNASREE.K.R, AGED 25 YEARS, D/O.K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, KODAPARMBIL HOUSE, PARAPOOKARAQ VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, PARAPPUKARA.P.O, PIN-680310.** - **7 NIDHIN.K.A, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.K.V.ASOKAN, KATTIKUZHY VILLAGE, EDAKKUNIR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK, PIN-680306.** - **8 DIJOHNS VARGHESE, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O VARGHESE V.C, VADAKKETHALA HOUSE, VELOOR VILLAGE,KUNNAMKULAM TALUK, VELOOR.P.O,PIN-680601.** - **9 SREERAJ M.D, AGED 26 YEARS,S/O DEVARAJAN, MEPPURATH HOUSE, ELAMPAZHANOOR.P.O,CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLAM,PIN-691534.** - **10 SAYOOJ K.C, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O CHANDRAN K.C, MIDHILA, KOTTAYI 2 VILLAGE, ALATHUR TALUK, VARODE.P.O,PIN-678572.** - **11 ABIJITH K.N, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O NARAYANAN P, KAKKAMADAM HOUSE, MATHUR VILLAGE,ALATHUR TALUK, MATHUR AGRAHARAM.P.O,PIN-678571.** - **12 SHIBU DHAMODARAN, AGED 33 YEARS, S/.O DAMODARAN P.M, PALARIL HOUSE, VADAKKUMBHAGAM VILLAGE,CHALAKUDY TALUK, ASHTAMICHIRA.P.O,PIN-680731.** **-:3:-** Crl.M.C. 8107/19 **13 RIYAS E.R, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O E.K.MUHAMMED RASHEED, ERAVALAPPIL HOUSE, THRISSUR VILLAGE,THRISSUR TALUK, VELIYANNOOR, KOKKASLA.P.O,PIN-680021.** **14 MANU MOHAN, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O K.K.MOHANAN, KUMBALAKODU HOUSE, ALATHUR VILLAGE, ALATHUR TALUK, P.O.ALATHUR,PIN-678541.** **15 ZAFDHAR SHEREEF, AGED 24 YEARS,S/O.H.M.HUSSAIN SHEREEF, ROSHANI HOUSE, PIRAYIRI VILLAGE,PALAKKAD TALUK, KALLEKAD.P.O,PIN-678006. 16 HASEENA.A, AGED 28 YEARS, D/O ABDUL RAHMAN, KUNDIL HOUSE, CHENNAALAMKUNDU,VENNUR POST, ELANADU,VENNUR VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK,PIN-680587.** **17 N.S.HASNA MOL, AGED 29 YEARS, D/O SREEDHARAN, KAMPOTHU CHIRA, KODAMTHURUTH,KUTHIATHODE.P.O, CHERTHALA,PIN-688533.** **BY ADV. SMT.ARCHANA MITHRAN O.K.** ## **RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:** **1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682018.** - **2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER THRISSUR TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, THRISSUR,PIN-680003.** **3 SILPA AGED 26 YEARS, D/O PARAMESWARAN NAIR, CHANGARAMKANDATHINATH VEEDU,** Crl.M.C. 8107/19 ## **-:4:-** **ARIMBOOR,NADAR.P.O,HSS ARIMBOOR, PARAKKAD VILLAGE, THRISSUR,PIN-680004.** **4 ARSHA DHARMAPALAN AGED 25 YEARS, D/O DHARMAPALAN, THAZHATHVEETTIL VEEDU, FIELD NAGAR,KOLAZHI DESOM AND VILLAGE, THRISSUR,PIN-680010.** **5 NIJI.S AGED 28 YEARS, D/O SUSEELAN, KUNNAVILA HOUSE, THETTIKULAM, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695141.** **R3-5 BY ADV. TINU JOHNSON** **SRI.SANTHOSH PETER, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR** **THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:** **-:5:-** Crl.M.C. 8107/19 ## **ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.** **= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C.No.8107 of 2019** **- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -** Dated this the 18[th] day of November, 2019 ## **O R D E R** The petitioners herein have been arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 17 in Annexure-A1 FIR in Crime No.216/2014 of Thrissur Town West Police Station, Thrissur, registered for offences punishable under Secs.143, 147, 294(b), 341, 506(ii) r/w Sec.149 of the Indian Penal Code, which led to the pendency of Annexure-A2 final report in C.C.No.1228/2014 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Thrissur. It is stated that now the entire disputes between the petitioners herein and the respondents 3 to 5/ de facto complainants have been settled amicably and that the respondents 3 to 5 have sworn to Annexures-A3, A4 and A5 affidavits before this Court, wherein it is stated that they have settled the entire disputes with the petitioners and that they have no objection for quashment of the impugned criminal proceedings pending against Crl.M.C. 8107/19 ## **-:6:-** the petitioners. It is in the light of these aspects that the petitioners have preferred the instant Crl.M.C. with the prayer to quash the impugned criminal proceedings against them. 2. In a catena of decisions, the Apex Court has held that, in appropriate cases involving even non-compoundable offences, the High Court can quash prosecution by exercise of the powers under Sec.482 of the Cr.P.C., if the parties have really settled the whole dispute or if the continuance of the prosecution will not serve any purpose. Here, this Court finds a real case of settlement between the parties and it is also found that continuance of the prosecution in such a situation will not serve any purpose other than wasting the precious time of the court, when the case ultimately comes before the court. On a perusal of the petition and on a close scrutiny of the investigation materials on record and the affidavit of settlement and taking into account the attendant facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is of the considered opinion that the legal principles laid down by the Apex Court in the cases as in _**Gian Singh** v._ _**State of Punjab**_ reported in 2013 (1) SCC (Cri) 160 = (2012) 10 SCC 303 and _**Narinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and anr**_ . reported in (2014) 6 SCC 466, more particularly paragraph 29 thereof, could be applied in this case to consider the prayer for Crl.M.C. 8107/19 ## **-:7:-** quashment. 3. Accordingly, it is ordered in the interest of justice that the impugned Annexure-A1 FIR in Crime No.216/2014 of Thrissur Town West Police Station, Thrissur, which led to the pendency of Annexure-A2 final report in C.C.No.1228/2014 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Thrissur and all further proceedings arising therefrom pending against all the accused will stand quashed. 4. The petitioners will produce certified copies of this order to the Investigating Officer concerned and the competent court below concerned. Office of Advocate General will forward a copy of this order to the Investigating Officer concerned, for necessary information. With these observations and directions, the above Criminal Miscellaneous Case stands finally disposed of. ## **Sd/-** **ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE** vgd Crl.M.C. 8107/19 ## **-:8:-** ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.216/2014 OF THRISSUR TOWN WEST POLICE STATION,THRISSUR PENDING AS C.C.NO.1228/2014 ON THE FILES OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURTII,THRISSUR. ANNEXURE A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT FIR IN CRIME NO.216/2014 OF THRISSUR TOWN WEST POLICE STATION,THRISSUR PENDING AS C.C.NO.1228/2014 ON THE FILES OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURTII,THRISSUR. ANNEXURE A3 COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT ANNEXURE A4 COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT ANNEXURE A5 COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT.** ## **RESPONDENT'S/S' EXHIBITS:** **NIL**