High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeBail granted

Anas v. State of Kerala

Case / Petition Number:11409 of 2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C.S. Dias
Judgment Date
2024-01-08
Court Decision / Holding
Application allowed; the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on a bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two solvent sureties of like amount. Bail conditions include: (i) appearance before the investigating officer on alternate Saturdays for three months or until final report is filed; (ii) not induce or tamper with witnesses; (iii) not commit any offence while on bail; (iv) surrender passport if any; (v) provision for cancellation/modification of bail for violation; (vi) IO may investigate and recover, if necessary, even while on bail, following Sushila Aggarwal principles.
Final Disposition
Bail granted

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Anas

Respondents

  • State of Kerala

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sruthy N. Bhat
  • • Nikita J. Mendez

Counsels for Respondents

  • • C.S. Hrithwik, Senior Public Prosecutor

Case Synopsis & Summary

Anas, the sole applicant in Bail Application No. 11409/2023 before the High Court of Kerala, sought bail under Section 439 CrPC in connection with crime No. 1558/2023 of the Kilikolloor Police Station, Kollam, alleging possession of 4.302 kg of ganja (an NDPS Act intermediate quantity). Arrested on 9 November 2023, he contends innocence and a false implication. The prosecution’s case is that the accused were found in possession of ganja at 17:40 on 9.11.2023. It is conceded that the final report has not yet been filed, and the investigation remains incomplete. The petitioner invokes the proviso to sub-section 2 of Section 167 CrPC, arguing entitlement to statutory bail since the final report has not been laid within the mandated 60/90-day period. The Public Prosecutor does not oppose bail and concedes the arrest date and pendency of the final report. The Court, after evaluating the materials, holds that the applicant is entitled to statutory bail given the pendency of final report and that the quantity, while NDPS-related, does not counter the statutory entitlement in light of the delay. The order imposes bond conditions including Rs.1,00,000 bond with two solvent sureties, appearance on Saturdays, no intimidation or tampering, surrender of passport, and potential modification/cancellation of bail for violations. The court also cites Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi to support the IO's powers to investigate and recover while on bail.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS ActSection 29 of the NDPS ActProviso to sub-section (2) of Section 167 of the CrPC

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Statutory Bail under proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC
  • IO power to investigate and effect recoveries on bail (as per Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

Applicant contends innocence and false implication; investigation not complete; final report not filed; entitled to statutory bail under proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC; nature of the offence being NDPS does not negate entitlement given delay in final report; seeks release to prepare defence.

Contentions of Respondents

Prosecution conceded arrest on 9.11.2023 and pendency of final report; did not oppose bail; relies on statutory provision that allows bail when final report is not laid within prescribed time, given ongoing investigation and intermediate quantity.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another2020 (1) KHC 663PositiveCited to justify that the investigating officer may continue to investigate and effect recoveries even while the accused is on bail, in line with Supreme Court guidance.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Anas v. State of Kerala and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

1 Bail Application No. 10949 of 2023 ## **`THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS ``` ``` MONDAY, THE 8[TH] DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 18TH POUSHA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 11409 OF 2023 ``` ``` CRIME NO.1558/2023 OF Kilikolloor Police Station, Kollam PETITIONER/S: ``` ``` ANAS AGED 30 YEARS S/O. NISAMUDHEEN, SIRAJUDEEN MANZIL, PANCHAYATVILA VEEDU, AYATHIL P.O., KOLLAM, PIN - 691017 BY ADVS. SRUTHY N. BHAT NIKITA J. MENDEZ ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` C.S. HRITHWIK, SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ``` ``` THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` 2 Bail Application No. 10949 of 2023 ## **C.S.DIAS,J** **====================== Bail Application No. 11409 of 2023 ----------------------------------Dated this the 8[th] day of January, 2024** ## **O R D E R** The application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the first accused in crime No.1558/2023 of the Kilikolloor Police Station, Kollam, registered against the accused (five in number) alleging them to have committed the offences punishable under Sec.20(b)(ii) (B) and 29 of the NDPS Act (in short, ‘Act’). The petitioner was arrested on 9.11.2023. 3 Bail Application No. 10949 of 2023 2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that: On 9.11.2023 at about 17:40 hours, the accused were found in possession of 4.302 kg of ganja. Thus, the accused have committed the above offences. 3. Heard; Smt.Sruthy N.Bhat, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.C.S Hrithwik, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is totally innocent of the accusations levelled against him. He has been falsely implicated in the crime. Moreover, the petitioner was arrested on 9.11.2023. The quantity involved is 4 Bail Application No. 10949 of 2023 intermediate. The prosecution has not filed its final report till date. Hence the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of the proviso to sub-sec (2) of Sec.167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Hence, the petitioner may be released on bail. 5. The learned Public Prosecutor fairly conceded to the fact that the petitioner was arrested on 9.11.2023 and the final report has not been filed till date. 6. Indisputably, the petitioner was arrested on 9.11.2023 on the allegation that he was found in possession of 4.302 kg of ganja, which is intermediate quantity. The prosecution concedes to the fact that the 5 Bail Application No. 10949 of 2023 investigation is not complete and the final report has not been filed. 7. The proviso to sub-sec(2) of Sec.167 specifically mandates that if the final report is not laid within 60/90 days from the date of arrest, the petitioner is entitled for compulsive/statutory bail. 8. On an appreciation of the materials placed on record and particularly taking note of the fact that the petitioner was arrested on 9.11.2023 and the final report has not been laid, I am of the definite view that the petitioner is entitled to statutory bail. 6 Bail Application No. 10949 of 2023 In the result, the application is allowed, by directing the petitioner to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction, which shall be subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every alternate Saturdays between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m for a period of three months or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier. He shall also appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required; 7 Bail Application No. 10949 of 2023 (ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or procure to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner, whatsoever; (iii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while they are on bail; (iv) The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, before the court below at the time of execution of the bond. If he has no passport, he shall file an affidavit 8 Bail Application No. 10949 of 2023 to the effect before the court below on the date of execution of the bond; - (v) In case of violation of any of the conditions mentioned above, the jurisdictional court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law. (vi) Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall be filed and entertained before the court below. (vii) Needless to mention, it would be well within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate 9 Bail Application No. 10949 of 2023 the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in **Sushila Aggarwal v. State of Delhi and another** [2020 (1) KHC 663]. sd/- sks/8.1.2024 **C.S.DIAS, JUDGE** 10 Bail Application No. 10949 of 2023 ## **`APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 11409/2023`** ``` PETITIONER ANNEXURES ``` ``` Annexure 1TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 05-12-2023, IN CRL.M.C. NO.2522/2023 OF THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLLAM ```