High Court of KeralaSingle JudgePetition allowed in part; vehicle released with...

Ananthakrishnan P.S v. State of Kerala

Case / Petition Number:CRL.MC NO. 2303 OF 2024

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Bechu Kurian Thomas
Judgment Date
2024-03-25
Court Decision / Holding
Petition allowed in part; the vehicle KL-32-J-7787 is ordered to be released to the petitioner on conditions: bond of Rs.50,000 with two solvent sureties; bank guarantee Rs.1,00,000; affidavit not to sell or transfer; maintenance obligation; bank guarantee invocable upon recurrence; failure to comply results in forfeiture. The disposal of the case to be via the judicial process.
Final Disposition
Petition allowed in part; vehicle released with conditions in CRL.MC 2303/2024

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Ananthakrishnan P.S

Respondents

  • The State of Kerala represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam, PIN - 682031

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • C.H. Abdul Rasac
  • • Krishnapriya R.

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT. Sreeja V. (PP)

Case Synopsis & Summary

Ananthakrishnan P.S., the registered owner of vehicle KL-32-J-7787, seeks interim custody of the vehicle after it was seized on 16.08.2023 in connection with alleged offences under Sections 269 and 278 IPC, and Section 120(e) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011, for dumping septic waste into a public drain. He moved CMP No.4578/2023 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Alappuzha, under Section 451 Cr.P.C. but the magistrate dismissed the application on 10.01.2024, in line with a Division Bench directive in WP(C) No.7844 of 2023 directing that vehicles involved in dumping waste into drains or public places should not be released without the court’s permission. The petitioner challenges that order, arguing the seriousness of the alleged offense should be weighed against the benefit of not detaining a vehicle for an extended period, and that the long detention serves no one’s interests. The High Court acknowledges the public health hazard but also recalls Sundarbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat (2002) 10 SCC 283, and Krishnan (2000) 7 SCC 80, to justify imposing safeguards to prevent recurrence. It ultimately imposes stringent conditions: a Rs.50,000 bond with two sureties, a Rs.1,00,000 bank guarantee, an affidavit not to transfer, vehicle maintenance obligations, and a clause permitting invocation of the bank guarantee if similar offences recur, and releases the vehicle subject to these terms.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 451 Cr.P.CSection 269 IPCSection 278 IPCSection 120(e) Kerala Police Act, 2011

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Sundarbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat (2002) 10 SCC 283 — doctrine that in serious offences involving environmental/public health concerns, long detention should not be automatic and bank guarantees may be imposed; safeguards to prevent recurrence should be considered.
  • State of Kerala v. Krishnan (2000) 7 SCC 80 — principle that, in serious offences, release should not be routine and minimum bank guarantees should be imposed.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks interim custody of the seized vehicle under Section 451 Cr.P.C, arguing that the long detention is counterproductive and that the Court should comply with the ongoing directive for preventive waste management, while ensuring the availability of the vehicle under stringent conditions to prevent recurrence.

Contentions of Respondents

The State contends the offence is serious; that vehicular release is not to be allowed without safeguards; citing public health hazards and the need for a bank guarantee as a deterrent.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sundarbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat(2002) 10 SCC 283PositiveSupreme Court observed that vehicles involved in serious offences should not be released as a matter of course; minimum bank guarantee conditions may be imposed to prevent recurrence and ensure public interest.
State of Kerala v. Krishnan(2000) 7 SCC 80PositiveThe Court noted that in serious offences, vehicles ought not be released as a matter of course and minimum bank guarantee conditions should be imposed.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Ananthakrishnan P.S v. State of Kerala and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

``` CRL.MC NO. 2303 OF 2024 ``` ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS MONDAY, THE 25[TH] DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1946 ``` ``` CRL.MC NO. 2303 OF 2024 ``` ``` CRIME NO.1193/2023 OF MANNANCHERRY POLICE STATION, Alappuzha AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 10.01.2024 IN CMP NO.4578 OF 2023 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - II(MOBILE),ALAPPUZHA ``` ``` PETITIONER: ``` ``` ANANTHAKRISHNAN P.S AGED 29 YEARS ``` ``` S/O. SOMAN, PUTHAPURAKKAL,MUHAMMA P.O, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688555 ``` ``` BY ADVS. C.H.ABDUL RASAC KRISHNAPRIYA R. ``` ## **`RESPONDENT:`** ``` THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ``` SMT. SREEJA V. (PP) ``` ``` THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ``` ``` ON 25.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` CRL.MC NO. 2303 OF 2024 ``` ## BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. ======================== Crl.M.C. No. 2303 of 2024 ======================== Dated this the 25[th] day of March, 2024 ## O R D E R Petitioner is the registered owner of a vehicle bearing registration No.KL-32-J-7787. The said vehicle was seized, alleging commission of offences under Sections 269 and 278 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, apart from Section 120(e) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011. The vehicle of the petitioner is alleged to have been used for dumping septic waste into a public drain on 16-08-2023. 2. Petitioner filed an application as CMP No.4578/2023 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Alappuzha, under Section 451 Cr.P.C, seeking interim custody of the vehicle. However, by the impugned order dated 10.01.2024, the application was dismissed after noticing that a Divison Bench of this Court had, in WP(C) No.7844 of 2023, stressed the need for a preventive approach to waste management and directed not to release vehicles involved in dumping ``` CRL.MC NO. 2303 OF 2024 ``` ``` 3 ``` waste into public drains and other public places, without getting permission from this Court. Petitioner assails the aforesaid order. 3. The vehicle was seized on 16.08.2023 and has been in the custody of the police since then. The alleged offence committed by the petitioner is serious, especially since septic waste is alleged to have been dumped into a public place, which eventually flows into the rivers. The seriousness of the alleged offence and the public health issues of such acts ought to be taken into consideration, while considering the release of the vehicle. At the same time, the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Sunderbha **i** Ambalal Desa **i** v. State of Gujarat [(2002) 10 SCC 283] cannot be ignored, especially since the long period of detention of the vehicle may not benefit any person. 4. Considering the seriousness of the offence alleged, this Court is of the view that stringent conditions ought to be imposed to prevent the recurrence of such crimes. 5. Petitioner's vehicle is alleged to have been involved ``` CRL.MC NO. 2303 OF 2024 ``` ``` 4 ``` in a similar offence on an earlier occasion, which is evident from Crime No.472/2023 of Mannancherry Police Station. Therefore, there is an alleged pattern of repeated involvement of the same vehicle in similar offences. Unless stringent conditions are imposed, there is a possibility of the petitioner committing similar offences again with the same vehicle itself. Storm water drains most often discharge into the rivers or other water sources. Discharge of faecal waste into storm drains is a public health hazard, which requires stringent action. In fact, recently, the local authorities' statutes have been amended to incorporate provisions for the confiscation of vehicles that indulge in discharge waste into public properties. 6. In the decision in State of Kerala v. K.Kr **i** shnan [(2000) 7 SCC 80] , the Supreme Court had observed that in serious offences involving Forest and Wild Life, the vehicles ought not be released as a matter of course, and at least minimum conditions for furnishing a bank guarantee should be imposed. Taking a cue from the above decision and ``` CRL.MC NO. 2303 OF 2024 ``` ``` 5 ``` bearing in mind the public health issues that arise out of the dumping of septic waste into public drains, this Court is of the view that similar conditions for furnishing a bank guarantee ought to be imposed while releasing the vehicle on interim custody. 7. In the instant case, the petitioners vehicle was seized on 16.08.2023 and has been in the custody of the police since then. No purpose would be achieved by retaining the vehicle in custody. However, while releasing the vehicle, it has to be ensured that it is not used for repeating similar offences. Many a time, the offences are done under the cover of night and unless strict conditions are imposed, there would be a tendency to indulge in such acts on the sly. Hence, this Court is of the view that, while releasing vehicles found indulging in the illegal discharge of waste, imposing conditions for furnishing bank guarantees would be reasonable, reckoning the need to prevent such recurrent activities. 8. In the circumstances, the vehicle bearing ``` CRL.MC NO. 2303 OF 2024 ``` ``` 6 ``` Registration No.KL-32-J-7787 is directed to be released to the petitioner on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.50,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate. (ii) Petitioners shall furnish a bank guarantee of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only), which shall be kept valid till the disposal of the case against the petitioner in Crime No.1193 of 2023 of Mannancherry Police Station. (iii) Petitioner shall file an affidavit, undertaking that he shall not sell, transfer or assign the vehicle to any person and also that he shall produce the vehicle as and when required. The affidavit shall also mention that the Bank Guarantee fiurnished can be invoked if in case the vehicle is used for similar offences. (iv) The petitioner shall maintain the vehicle in a usable condition and carry out regular repairs and maintenance work of the vehicle. (v). The petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offences. In ``` CRL.MC NO. 2303 OF 2024 ``` ``` 7 ``` case any such offences are committed, the Police can invoke the bank guarantee, and the amount will be payable to the respective local authority to be used for environmental measures. On satisfaction of the above conditions, the vehicle shall be released to the petitioner. ``` Sd/- ``` BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE ``` saap ``` ``` CRL.MC NO. 2303 OF 2024 ``` ``` 8 ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 2303/2024`** ## **`PETITIONER ANNEXURES`** ``` Annexure A1A TRUE COPY OF THE RC BOOK OF THE VEHICLE Annexure A2A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN CMP NO. 3448/2023 DATED 20.12.2023 Annexure A3A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CMP NO. 4578/2023 DATED 10.1.2024 ```