High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of with directions to di...

Ali Akbar Ayappally v. Special Tahsildar (LR) Land Tribunal-Tirur and Village Officer, Athavanad Village, Malappuram District

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.8663 OF 2021(G)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-31
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.420/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment, and by incorporating the GO. No.09/2018/RD. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with directions to dispose of S.M.No.420/2021 as per Narayanan Namboodiri and 2018 GO guidelines; no costs awarded.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Ali Akbar Ayappally s/o Saleem, Ayappally House, Kavungal, Athavanad, Malappuram District, Kerala

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar (LR) Land Tribunal-Tirur, Tirur P.O., Malappuram District, Kerala
  • The Village Officer, Athavanad Village, Malappuram District, Kerala

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. P.T. Sheejish

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K. Amminikutty, Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Ali Akbar Ayappally filed this writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus to direct the Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious inquiry and dispose of S.M. No.420/2021 before the Land Tribunal, Tirur. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord's right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The property is in Re-Sy.No.239/3-4, Athavanad Village, Malappuram District. The petitioner contends that expeditious disposal is essential for access to bank financing and to prevent undue delay, and cites the Court’s earlier decision in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases) underscoring that tribunals must dispose cases in seniority order and within specified time frames. The Government's GO, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018, directing village officers to assist tribunals, was noted. After hearing, the court held that the Land Tribunal should proceed strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions and the 2018 GO, and ordered expeditious disposal of S.M. No.420/2021. No costs were awarded.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of cases by the Land Tribunal, especially those filed by senior citizens, on seniority basis
  • The Land Tribunal must dispose of cases in strict accordance with law and the directions of this Court or higher authorities
  • Maintain the seniority of cases and not break it except as directed by this Court or higher authorities
  • Village Officers may be used to provide reports to the Land Tribunal to facilitate disposal

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M. No.420/2021 before the Land Tribunal is necessary to facilitate timely vesting and purchase transactions, and for the petitioner's access to credit and financial arrangements. He relies on the decision in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another, and seeks a mandamus directing expeditious action consistent with the seniority-based disposal framework and the GO guidance for speedy adjudication.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents argue for adherence to established procedures and seniority-based disposal of cases before the Land Tribunal. They point to the large pendency and to the need to follow the directions set out in Narayanan Namboodiri and the GO 2018 guidelines, including obtaining necessary reports via Village Officers and ensuring lawful processing without breaking the established seniority of cases.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited for establishing the principle of expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal cases on seniority, including the six-month/18-month timelines and the directive to follow the prescribed directions in the judgment.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Ali Akbar Ayappally v. Special Tahsildar (LR) Land Tribunal-Tirur and Village Officer, Athavanad Village, Malappuram District and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.8663 OF 2021(G)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **ALI AKBAR AYAPPALLY AGED 35 YEARS S/O. SALEEM, AYAPPALLY HOUSE, KAVUNGAL, ATHAVANAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN – 676 301** **BY ADV. SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** 1. **THE SPECIAL THAHSILDAR (LR) LAND TRIBUNAL-TIRUR, TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN- 676 101 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ATHAVANAD VILLAGE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT KERALA, PIN – 676 505** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY -SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.8663 OF 2021(G) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.420/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 9.33 Ares of land comprised in Re-Sy.No.239/3-4 of Athavanad Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.8663 OF 2021(G) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.8663 OF 2021(G) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.8663 OF 2021(G) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.8663 OF 2021(G) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Athavanad Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.420/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P2 certificate dated 26.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. W.P(C).No.8663 OF 2021(G) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.420/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 9. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.420/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.8663 OF 2021(G) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 23.10.2018.** **EXHIBIT P2** **THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF SUOMOTO PROCEEDINGS IN SM NO.420/2021 DATED 26.2.2021.**