High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petitions dismissed

Akhil James and Abhijith H v. State of Kerala and others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) Nos. 21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • V.G. Arun
Judgment Date
2023-01-05
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petitions dismissed.
Final Disposition
Writ petitions dismissed

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Akhil James
  • Abhijith H

Respondents

  • State of Kerala
  • Director of Medical Education
  • LBS Centre for Science and Technology
  • Kerala University of Health Sciences

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Thomas M. Jacob
  • • T. R. Jerry Sebastian
  • • KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM (SR.)
  • • Shameena Salahudheen

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Shri. P. Sreekumar, SC, Kerala University of Health Sciences
  • • Government Pleader
  • • Shameena Salahudheen

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition challenges the exclusion of two B.Sc courses—Medical Biochemistry and Medical Microbiology—from the 2018-19 prospectus for admission to professional degree and para-medical streams in Kerala. The petitioners, Akhil James and Abhijith H, were students enrolled in these courses in 2018, and until then the courses had been listed in prospectuses since 2015-16. By GO MS No.75/2018/H&FWD dated 18 May 2018, the Government approved a prospectus that omitted the two courses, with the Director of Medical Education explaining four reasons: (a) the courses are not conducted in Government Medical Colleges; (b) there are no posts in the Medical Education Department for the two courses; (c) the Centre for Health Science at the University of Calicut is not affiliated to KUHS; and (d) other private institutes offer those courses. The petitioners contended these grounds were factually incorrect or untenable; they argued that many listed courses are not offered in government colleges, that there are academic and employment opportunities for graduates of these courses, and that post-graduate and teaching posts would permit them to work in the sector; the issue raises questions about the policy decision making rather than violation of fundamental rights. The Government asserted that exclusion was a policy decision not subject to interference. After reviewing the objections, the court held the matter non-interferable: mere errors in policy do not warrant judicial review, and since the petitioners had joined the courses, they cannot challenge the prospectus. The petitions were dismissed.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala University of Health Sciences Act, 2010, Section 50UGC Act, 1956, Section 22

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Judicial review of policy decisions: Mere errors of government are not subject to judicial review (State of Orissa v. Gopinath Dash)
  • Policy decisions must be left to the Government; courts will not substitute its judgment in policy matters unless fundamental rights are involved
  • Metropolis Theater Co. v. City of Chicago: Government problems are practical and not always amenable to judicial exactitude; mere errors of government are not subject to our judicial review

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners argued that excluding B.Sc Medical Bio-Chemistry and B.Sc Medical Microbiology from the common entrance prospectus for 2018-19 is factually incorrect and untenable. They asserted that the four reasons offered by the Director of Medical Education (a) not being conducted in government medical colleges is irrelevant since numerous listed courses are not offered there; (b) the claim of no posts in the Medical Education Department for these courses is contradicted by existing scientific officer and bio-chemist posts; (c) the claim that the Centre for Health Science is not affiliated to KUHS ignores statutory provisions and the KUHS Act; and (d) subsidiary institutes offering the courses undermine the assertion of non-availability. They contended that MCI regulations permit graduates of these streams to fill teaching posts and that there are academic and employment opportunities in both government and private sectors. They argued the policy decision is arbitrary and not immune from review when fundamental rights are engaged. They urged the Court to examine the decision’s legality rather than substitute its own policy view.

Contentions of Respondents

The Government Pleader and KUHS contended that exclusion of the two courses was a policy decision of the Government and not subject to judicial review merely because students have joined or completed the course. They submitted that the courses are not offered in government institutions in Kerala and there are no corresponding posts in the Medical Education Department for these courses. They argued that the affiliation matter is governed by KUHS Act provisions and that the existence of private institutes offering the courses does not undermine the policy choice. They emphasized the deference owed to executive decision-making in policy matters, and argued that the Court’s review is limited unless fundamental rights are implicated. They relied on the reasoning in State of Orissa v. Gopinath Dash and the Metropolis Theater rationale to support non-interference.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
State of Orissa and others v. Gopinath Dash and others[(2005) 13 SCC 495]PositiveCited to support the principle that policy decisions are to be left to the Government and that mere errors of government are not subject to judicial review; court should not substitute its own judgment in policy matters.
Metropolis Theater Co. v. City of Chicago[57 L Ed 730 : 228 US 61 (1912)]PositiveCited to illustrate that government problems are practical and not always amenable to judicial critique, supporting deference to policy decisions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Akhil James and Abhijith H v. State of Kerala and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN** **THURSDAY, THE 5[TH] DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 15TH POUSHA, 1944** ## **WP(C) NO. 21963 OF 2020** ## **PETITIONER/S:** 1 AKHIL JAMES AGED 22 YEARS S/O JAMES.A.C,EDATHINATTU HOUSE,KARUKACHAL,CHAMPAKARA.P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,PIN-686540. 2 ABHIJITH.H, AGED 19 YEARS S/O.K.B.HARIDAS,ANAND HOUSE, VARTHANAGAR,KANJIKUZHY.P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,PIN-686004. BY ADVS. THOMAS M.JACOB SRI.T.R.JERRY SEBASTIAN ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |1|STATE OF KERALA| |---|---| ||REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,| ||HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT,| ||GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,| ||PIN-695001.| |2|DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION,| ||DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION,| ||MEDICAL COLLEGE.P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,| ||PIN-695011.| |3|LBS CENTRE FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY.,| ||A GOVERNMENT OF KERALA UNDERTAKING,| ||EXTRA POLICE ROAD,NANDAVANAM,TRIVANDRUM,| ||PIN-695033,REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.| |4|KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES,| ||MEDICAL COLLEGE.P.O,THRISSUR,PIN-680596,| ||REPRESENTED BY ITS REGITRAR.| ||BY ADVS.| ||GOVERNMENT PLEADER| ||SMT.SHAMEENA SALAHUDHEEN| ||SHRI.P.SREEKUMAR, SC, KERALA UNIVERSITY OF| ||HEALTH SCIENCES| W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 **==> picture [16 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** GP AMMINIKUTTY K **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/07/2022, THE COURT ON 05.01.2023 ALONG WITH WP(C) No.18419/2021, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 -3- ## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN** **THURSDAY, THE 5[TH] DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 15TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 18419 OF 2021** ## **PETITIONER/S:** 1 AKHIL JAMES, AGED 22 YEARS S/O. JAMES A.C., EDATHINATTU HOUSE, KARUKACHAL, CHAMPAKARA P.O. KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686 540. 2 ABHIJITH H., AGED 19 YEARS S/O.K.B. HARIDAS, ANAND HOUSE, VARTHANAGAR, KANJIKUZHY P.O. KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM (SR.) THOMAS M.JACOB T.R.JERRY SEBASTIAN SHAMEENA SALAHUDHEEN ## **RESPONDENT/S:** 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 2 DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 01. 3 LBS CENTRE FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, A GOVERNMENT OF KERALA UNDERTAKING EXTRA POLICE ROAD, NANDAVANAM, TRIVANDRUM, 695 033, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. 4 KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, MEDICAL COLLEGE, P.O. THRISSUR, 680 596, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. BY ADVS. W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 **==> picture [16 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA SHRI.P.SREEKUMAR, SC, KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/07/2022, THE COURT ON 05.01.2023, ALONG WITH WPC No.21963/2020 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 -5- ## **JUDGMENT** Dated this the 5[th] day of January, 2023 The petitioners are/were students of B.Sc Medical Bio-Chemistry and B.Sc Medical Microbiology. They are aggrieved by the removal of their courses from the prospectus for the academic year 2018-19 published by the Director of Medical Education with the approval of the Government. The short facts are as under; B.SC Medical Microbiology and B.Sc Bio- Chemistry courses were being included in the prospectus for admission to professional degree courses and para-medical streams brought out by the Government of Kerala from the year 2015-2016 onwards. Initially the process of selection and allotment for para-medical courses was conducted through the Lal Bahadur Sastri Centre for Science and Technology. In 2017-2018 onwards, this W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 **==> picture [16 x 9] intentionally omitted <==** process was made over to the Commissioner for Entrance Examination, Kerala. While so, by G.O. (MS) No.75/2018/H&FWD dated 18.05.2018, Government approved the prospectus for admission to the professional degree courses in Nursing and Para-Medical Streams for the academic year 201819 submitted by the Director of Medical Education. Surprisingly, B.Sc Medical BioChemistry and B.Sc Medical Microbiology were not included in the prospectus. 2. On the Government seeking clarification for not including the above courses in the common Entrance Examination, the Director of Medical Education stated the following four reasons; _“a) These courses are not being conducted in Government Medical Colleges._ _b) There are no job opportunities/posts for these courses in the Medical Education Department._ _c) The Centre for Health Science, University of Calicut is not seen affiliated to Kerala University of Health Sciences._ W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 **==> picture [16 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** _d) School of Medical Education a subsidiary of M.G. University, Co-operative Institute of Thalassery, School of Medical Microbiology were giving admission for the said courses.”_ 3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, contended that the reasons for excluding B.Sc Medical Bio-Chemistry and B.Sc Medical Microbiology are factually incorrect and untenable. The first reason that the two courses are not conducted in Government Medical Colleges cannot be accepted, since many of the courses included in the prospectus are not conducted in Government Medical Colleges. Even otherwise, whether the course is conducted in Government Medical College or not is irrelevant as far as inclusion or exclusion of a course from the Government prospectus is concerned. The second reason that there is no post in Medical Education Department for the two courses is also incorrect, since the post of Scientific Officer, Scientific ## W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 -8- Assistant and Bio-Chemist in the Medical Education Department are held by Graduates in the above courses. Moreover, as per the Medical Council of India Regulations, the teaching posts in Medical Colleges are also available for Post Graduates in Microbiology and Bio-Chemistry. The third reason that the Centre for Health Science, University of Kerala is not affiliated to Kerala University of Health Science is unsustainable, since Section 50 of the Kerala University of Health Sciences Act, 2010 stipulates that the courses conducted by Universities will not come within the purview of affiliation to KUHS. The fourth reason is to be eschewed for the reason that there is no institutes by name, School of Medical Education, Kottayam or the School of Medical Microbiology under the Co-operative Institute of Health Sciences, Thalassery are conducting these courses. 4. The learned Government Pleader W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 -9- contended that the decision to exclude B.Sc Medical Bio-Chemistry and B.Sc Medical Microbiology being a policy decision of the Government, there cannot be any interference at the instance students who have already joined or have completed the course. It is submitted that the above courses are not conducted in any of the Government institutions in Kerala and there are no employment opportunities for the courses in the Government sector. For example, Laboratory Technicians have to be qualified in Medical Laboratory Technology or B.Sc. in laboratory Services. The Government of Kerala is conducting B.Sc.MLT (Medical Laboratory Technology) and M.Sc.MLT courses in addition to the DMLT courses in various Medical Colleges in Kerala, with a view to provide quality Laboratory Technology service to the poor and needy. Since these courses are conducted in the Government Medical Colleges in Kerala, the curriculum and syllabus ## W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 **==> picture [23 x 9] intentionally omitted <==** are to be designed, taking into consideration the latest technology available for catering to the needs of the poor and needy patients, who approach Government Medical Colleges as their last resort. 5. Having carefully considered the objection against exclusion of the courses and the explanation offered by the Government, I refrain from interfering with the decision at the instance of the petitioners for two reasons; (i) after joining for the courses, the petitioners cannot challenge the prospectus for admission. (ii) the decision to exclude B.Sc Medical BioChemistry and B.Sc Medical Microbiology being a policy decision, the scope for judicial review is extremely limited. In this regard, it may be apposite to refer the decision in _**State of Orissa**_ _**and others v. Gopinath Dash and others**_ **[(2005) 13 SCC 495],** the relevant portion of which is -11- ## W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 ## extracted hereunder; _“6. The correctness of the reasons which prompted the Government in decision-making taking one course of action instead of another is not a matter of concern in judicial review and the Court is not the appropriate forum for such investigation._ _7. The policy decision must be left to the Government as it alone can adopt which policy should be adopted after considering all the points from different angles. In the matter of policy decisions or exercise of discretion by the Government so long as the infringement of fundamental right is not shown the courts will have no occasion to interfere and the Court will not and should not substitute its own judgment for the judgment of the executive in such matters. In assessing the propriety of a decision of the Government the Court cannot interfere even if a second view is possible from that of the Government._ _8. The Court should constantly remind itself of what the Supreme Court of the United States said in Metropolis Theater Co. v. City of Chicago [57 L Ed 730 : 228 US 61 (1912)] :_ _“The problems of government are practical ones and may justify, if they do not require, rough accommodations, illogical it may be, and unscientific. But even such criticism should not be hastily expressed. What is the best is not always discernible, the wisdom of any_ W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 -12- _choice may be disputed or condemned. Mere errors of government are not subject to our judicial review.”_ For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are dismissed. Sd/- **V.G.ARUN JUDGE** Scl/ W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 -13- ## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21963/2020** PETITIONER EXHIBITS |EXHIBIT P1|TRUE TYPEWRITTEN COPY| |---|---| ||GO(RT)NO.3447/2015/H&FWD DATED| ||19.10.2015.| |EXHIBIT P2|TRUE COPY OF GO(MS)NO.L875/2018/H&FWD| ||DATED 18.5.2018.| |EXHIBIT P3|TRUE COPY OF CLARIFICATION LETTER| ||NO.B1/14206/2018/DME DATED 14.6.2018.| |EXHIBIT P4|TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF THE| ||MINIMUM QUALIFICATION FOR TEACHERS IN| ||MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS REGULATIONS,1998.| |EXHIBIT P5|TRUE COPY OF D.O.NO.F1-10/2004PT (CPP-| ||II)DATED 11.11.2009 FROM THE JOINT| ||SECRETARY OF UGC FORWARDING LIST OF 38| ||NEW DEGREES SPECIFIED UNDER SECTION 22| ||OF THE UGC ACT,1956 ALONG WITH| ||RELEVANT PORTION OF THE LIST.| |EXHIBIT P6|TRUE COPY OF NOTIFICATION DATED| ||14.2.2020 OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH| ||AND FAMILY WELFARE.| |EXHIBIT P7|TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED| ||7.7.2018 SUBMITTED BY ASSOCIATION OF| ||CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGIST AND| ||BIOCHEMIST.| |EXHIBIT P8|TRUE COPY OF GOVERNMENT ORDER GO-| ||(RT)NO.1729/2019/H&FWD DATED| ||15.7.2019.| |EXHIBIT P9|TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED| ||BY THE ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL| ||MICROBIOLOGISTS AND BIOCHEMISTS| ||(ACMB)DATED 6.12.2019.| |EXHIBIT P10|TRUE COPY OF G.O.(MS)NO.105/2020/H&FWD| ||DATED 22.07.2020 PUBLISHING PROSPECTUS| ||FOR 2020-2021.| W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 -14- ## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18419/2021** PETITIONER EXHIBITS |Exhibit P1|TRUE COPY OF GO (RT) NO.| |---|---| ||3447/2015/H&FED DATED 19.10.2015 WITH| ||TRUE TYPEWRITTEN COPY.| |Exhibit P2|TRUE COPY OF GO (MS) NO. 75/2018/H&FWD| ||DATED 18.5.2018.| |Exhibit P3|TRUE COPY OF CLARIFICATION LETTER NO.| ||BI/14206/2018/DME DATED 14.6.2018.| |Exhibit P4|TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF THE| ||MINIMUM QUALIFICATION FOR TEACHERS IN| ||MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS REGULATIONS,| ||1998.| |Exhibit P5|TRUE COPY OF F.O. NO. F1-10/2004PT| ||(CPP-II) DATED 11.11.2009 FROM THE| ||JOINT SECRETARY OF UGC FORWARDING LIST| ||OF 38 NEW DEGREE SPECIFIED UNDER| ||SECTION 22 OF THE UGC ACT, 1956 ALONG| ||WITH RELEVANT PORTION OF THE LIST.| |Exhibit P6|TRUE COPY OF NOTIFICATION DATED| ||14.2.2020 OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH| ||AND FAMILY WELFARE.| |Exhibit P7|TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED| ||7.7.2018 SUBMITTED BY ASSOCIATION OF| ||CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGIST AND| ||BIOCHEMIST.| |Exhibit P8|TRUE COPY OF GOVERNMENT ORDER GO-(RT)| ||NO. 1729/2019/H & FWD DATED 15.7.2019.| |Exhibit P9|TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED| ||BY THE ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL| ||MICROBIOLOGISTS AND BIOCHEMISTS (ACMB)| ||DATED 6.12.2019.| |Exhibit P10|TRUE COPY OF G.O.(MS), NO.| ||105/2020/H&FWD DATED 22.07.2020| ||PUBLISHING PROSPECTUS FOR 2020-2021.| |Exhibit P11|TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT FILED BY| ||THE GOVERNMENT IN WPC NO. 21963/2020.| |Exhibit P12|TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY AFFIDAVIT FILED| ||BY THE PETITIONERS IN WPC NO.| ||21963/2020.| W.P.(C) Nos.21963 of 2020 & 18419 of 2021 -15- Exhibit P13 TRUE COPY OF GO (MS) NO. 148/2021/H& FWD DATED 9.08.21 P[PUBLISHING PROSPECTUS FOR 2021-2022. Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF THE IST PAGE OF THE PROSPECTUS FOR ADMISSION TO PROFESSIONAL DEGREE COURSE IN NURSING AND PARA MEDICAL STREAMS 2021-2022.