High Court of KeralaSingle JudgePetition disposed with directions to ensure smo...

Ajitha K. v. Returning Officer, Election to the Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society Kolayad Unit; Inspector, Office of the Asst. Registrar (General), Kannur; Superintendent of Police, Kannur; Circle Inspector of Police, Mattannur; Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society Ltd.

Case / Petition Number:W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-12
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondents 2 and 3 to ensure smooth conduct of the election in accordance with the directions contained in Circular No. 28/2013 (State Police Chief) and Circular No. 20.11.2013. The 1st respondent is directed to verify voters’ identities against Form 6A/6B and the society’s Form 6B register, and to ensure there is no bogus voting or impersonation. If the petitioner requests videography of the election process, such videography shall be arranged at the petitioner’s expense and shall be permissible without disturbing voters or polling staff.
Final Disposition
Petition disposed with directions to ensure smooth conduct of the election; identity verification and potential videography on request; compliance with police circulars for fair election.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Ajitha K.

Respondents

  • The Returning Officer, Election to Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society Kolayad Unit, Office of the Asst. Registrar (General), Kannur
  • The Superintendent of Police, Kannur
  • The Circle Inspector of Police, Mattannur
  • The Secretary, Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society Ltd.

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. Pranoy K. Kottaram
  • • Sri Gracious Kuriakose (Sr) for petitioner

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri Lakshmi Narayan - R1
  • • Sri Sivaraman P.L - R4
  • • Sri Sunil Nath N.B - Government Pleader (for Respondents 2 & 3)

Case Synopsis & Summary

Ajitha K., President of the managing committee of Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the impending election to the society’s new managing committee scheduled for 14 February 2021. She sought a mandamus to verify the identity of each voter against the Form 6B register maintained by the society, in the presence of the society’s secretary (respondent 4), and to take all necessary steps to ensure a fair and transparent election. The petition references irregularities in a prior election identified by the Co-operative Arbitration Court (Northern, Kozhikode) in 2014 and relies on that history to demand safeguards, including identity verification and video documentation. The Court directed the Returning Officer to verify voters’ identity with Form 6A/6B and relevant documentation and to consider videographing the process at the petitioner’s expense if requested, without disturbing polling. The judgment cites Lord Denning’s Due Process of Law to emphasize proper policing and non-arbitrary conduct, and cites Manohar Lal Sharma and Ankush Maruti Shinde to underscore police duty to protect life, liberty, and property while pursuing truth in investigations. The petition is disposed with directions to ensure smooth conduct of the election under Circular No.28/2013 (State Police Chief) and Circular No.20.11.2013, allowing videography upon request.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Police Act, 2011 - Chapter II, Section 3Kerala Police Act, 2011 - Section 4Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules - Rule 35A(6)(n)(ix)

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Due Process of Law
  • Police must act impartially and protect life, liberty and dignity of all persons in accordance with the law

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner submits that the upcoming election of the Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society Ltd. must be conducted with rigorous safeguards to prevent irregularities and manipulation. She seeks a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to verify the validity of each voter's identity using the Form 6B register, in the presence of the 4th respondent Secretary, prior to the election scheduled for 14.02.2021. The petitioner emphasizes prior irregularities found by the Co-operative Arbitration Court (Northern, Kozhikode) in 2014 and argues for transparency, including videography of the voting process at her expense if requested. She also seeks that all steps be taken to ensure free and fair elections, including verification of identity against Form 6A/6B and the society's records, and adherence to applicable rules and circulars. The reliefs requested are anchored in Article 226 and the constitutional mandate of fair elections and protection of voters’ rights.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents’ submissions center on ensuring a fair and orderly election in line with statutory provisions and established procedures. They contend that the Returning Officer and the Circle Inspector of Police should oversee the process to ensure smooth conduct, with compliance to the Circular No.28/2013 (State Police Chief) and related guidelines. They indicate that the 1st respondent will take necessary steps to prevent bogus voting and impersonation, with identity verification using Form 6A/6B and society records. The respondents emphasize coordination with the State Co-operative Election Commission and the police to maintain peace and order during the election, and they welcome videography only if conducted in a manner that does not disrupt voters or officials. They argue for a measured, rights-respecting approach that balances transparency with the practicalities of conducting a village society election.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secretary(2014) 2 SCC 532PositiveThe court cites this case to support the police's duty to protect life, liberty and property and to emphasize the investigative/public safety role as part of law enforcement.
Ankush Maruti Shinde v. State of Maharashtra(2019) 15 SCC 470PositiveThe court cites this case to reinforce the principle that the investigation should aim to search for truth and bring offenders to book, underscoring proper police conduct.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Ajitha K. v. Returning Officer, Election to the Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society Kolayad Unit; Inspector, Office of the Asst. Registrar (General), Kannur; Superintendent of Police, Kannur; Circle Inspector of Police, Mattannur; Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society Ltd. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** ## **FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 23RD MAGHA,1942** ## **W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **AJITHA K. AGED 42 YEARS W/O. SRENDRAN.C., PPK BHAVAN, PATTANUR, THALASSERY TALUK, KANUR 670 595.** **BY ADV. SRI.PRANOY K.KOTTARAM** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** - **1 THE RETURNING OFFICER ELECTION TO THE PATTANUR VILLAGE VANITHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY KOLAYAD UNIT INSPECTOR, OFFICE OF THE ASST. REGISTRAR (GENERAL), KUTHUPARAMBA, KANNUR 670 643.** - **2 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TALAP, KANNUR 670 002.** - **3 CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, MATTANNUR, KANNUR, 670702.** - **4 THE SECRETARY, PATTANUR VILLAGE VANITHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, NO. C. 1254, PATTANUR (P.O.), KANNUR 670 595.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SRI GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE (SR) FOR PETITIONER ; SRI SUNIL NATH N.B- GOVERNMENT PLEADER ; SRI LAKSHMI NARAYAN - R1 ; SRI SIVARAMAN P.L - R4** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C) 2 ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner, who is the President of the managing committee of Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society Ltd., has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Consitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent to verify the validity of the identity card of each voter with the Form 6B register maintained in the Society, in the presence of the 4[th] respondent Secretary in the election to the managing committee of the Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society Ltd, scheduled to be conducted on 14.02.2021. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to take all necessary steps for conducting fair and transparent election to the new managing committee of Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society. 2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, election to the new managing committee of the Society in question is scheduled to be held on 14.02.2021. In connection with the previous election to the managing committee of the Society, the Co-operative Arbitration Court (Northern), Kozhikode by order dated 10.01.2014, found certain irregularities in the conduct of election. The petitioner submitted Ext.P1 representation dated W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C) 3 30.01.2021 before the 1[st] respondent Returning officer; the 2[nd] respondent Superintendent of Police, Kannur; and also the 3[rd] respondent Circle Inspector of Police, Mattannur, Kannur and thereafter, moved this writ petition seeking the aforesaid reliefs. 3. On 05.02.2021, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Government Pleader was directed to get instructions. 4. On 11.02.2021, the learned Standing Counsel for State Co-operative Election Commission took notice on admission for the 1[st] respondent Returning Officer. The learned Government Pleader took notice on admission for respondents 2 and 3 and urgent notice on admission by e-mail was ordered to 4[th] respondent, returnable by 12.02.2021. The learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to furnish the e-mail ID and also a scanned copy of this writ petition to the Registry. 5. Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for the State Co-operative Election Commission for the 1[st] respondent Returning Officer, the learned Government Pleader for respondents 2 and 3 and also Sri. Adv. P. L. Sivaraman, the learned counsel for the 4[th] respondent. 6. The Kerala Police Act, 2011 is enacted to consolidate W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C) 4 and amend the law relating to the establishment, regulation, powers and duties of the Police Force in the State of Kerala and for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto. Chapter II of the Act deals with duties and functions of Police. Section 3 of the Act deals with general duties of Police. As per Section 3, the Police, as a service functioning category among the people as part of the administrative system shall, subject to the Constitution of India and the laws enacted thereunder, strive in accordance with the law, to ensure that all persons enjoy the freedoms and rights available under the law by ensuring peace and order, integrity of the nation, security of the State and protection of human rights. Section 4 of the Act deals with functions of Police. As per Section 4, the Police Officers shall, subject to the provisions of the Act, perform the functions enumerated in clauses (a) to (s) of Section 4. As per clause (a), the Police Officers shall enforce the law impartially; and as per clause (b), the Police Officers shall protect the life, liberty, property, human rights and dignity of all persons in accordance with the law. 7. Lord Denning in 'The Due Process of law' [First Indian Reprint 1993, Page 102] has described the role of the Police thus; "In safeguarding our freedoms, the police play vital role. Society for its defence needs a well-led, well- W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C) 5 trained and well-disciplined force or police whom it can trust, and enough of them to be able to prevent crime before it happens, or if it does happen, to detect it and bring the accused to justice. The police, of course, must act properly. They must obey the rules of right conduct. They must not extort confessions by threats or promises. They must not search a man's house without authority. They must not use more force than the occasion warrants." 8. In **Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secretary [(2014) 2 SCC 532]** the Apex Court held that, one of the responsibilities of the police is protection of life, liberty and property of citizens. The investigation of offences is one of the important duties the police has to perform. The aim of investigation is ultimately to search for truth and bring the offender to the book. The Apex Court reiterated the said principle in **Ankush Maruti Shinde v. State of Maharashtra [(2019) 15 SCC 470]** . 9. The learned Standing Counsel for the State Cooperative Election Commission would submit that the 1[st] respondent Returning Officer shall take necessary steps to ensure free and fair election to the managing committee of the Society in question. Videograph of the process of the election can be arranged at the request of the petitioner, on condition that the W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C) 6 entire expense has to be met by the petitioner herself. 10. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that the 3[rd] respondent Circle Inspector of Police shall take necessary steps for the smooth conduct of the election, taking note of the directions contained in Circular No.28/2013 of the State Police Chief dated 20.11.2013. 11. In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondents 2 and 3 to ensure smooth conduct of election to the managing committee of Pattanur Village Vanitha Co-operative Society Ltd., which is scheduled to be held on 14.02.2021, strictly in accordance with the directions contained in the Circular dated 20.11.2013 issued by the State Police Chief. The 1[st] respondent Returning Officer shall ensure that there is no bogus voting or impersonation of voters, by having the identity of the voters verified with reference to the relevant records maintained in the Society, the identity card issued in Form 6A or and any one of the document specified in the Explanation to Rule 35A(6)(n)(ix) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules, and also Form 6B register maintained in the Society. If the petitioner makes a written request before the 1[st] respondent Returning Officer to videograph the process of election, W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C) 7 at her own expenses, the said request shall be favourably considered by the said respondent. Such videography shall be permitted without causing any manner of disturbance to the voters and officials or in any manner interfering with the balloting done in the polling booths. Sd/- ## **ANIL K. NARENDRAN** **JUDGE** MIN W.P.(C) No.3025 OF 2021(C) 8 ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 30.01.2021.**