High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit Petition dismissed; no relief granted; Ext...

Ajith K.V. and others v. State of Kerala and Director of Higher Secondary Education and others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No. 16978 of 2010(V)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C. T. Ravikumar
Judgment Date
2010-06-02
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition dismissed; Ext.P5 stands as a valid decision in line with the Special Rules; there is no interference with the Government’s approach to feeder categories; the petitioners’ challenge fails on the grounds of executive domain over recruitment decisions and lack of challenge to the Rules themselves.
Final Disposition
Writ Petition dismissed; no relief granted; Ext.P5 upheld and not interfered with.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • AJITH K.V., Lab Assistant, G.G.H.S.S. Mattancherry, Ernakulam
  • RAHUL T.G., Lab Assistant, Govt. H.S.S. Trichodithanam, Changanassery
  • BINDU P.V., Lab Assistant, KSGHSS, Kadapra, Valanjavattom P.O, Thiruvalla, Kottayam Dist.
  • INDU K.N., Lab Assistant, Govt. H.S.S. Pazhamthottam
  • SEMEENA T.A., Lab Assistant, Govt. H.S.S. Pazhamthottam
  • KRISHNAKUMAR K.G, Lab Assistant, GHSS Mulanthuruthy
  • SUSANTH P.S., Lab Assistant, GHSS Vaniyambalam
  • SAJESH P.G., Lab Assistant, GHSS Pang, Pang Chendy V.O., Malappuram Dist.
  • SAJITH M, Lab Assistant, GRHSS Kottakkal
  • SINDU K., Lab Assistant, GHSS Mankada
  • PREM SANKAR S, Lab Assistant, Govt.H.S.S Poovar
  • SREEJA K, Lab Assistant, G.H.S.S Athavanad
  • SHIBILI BALAKRISHNAN, Lab Assistant, Govt.High School for Girls, Nadakkavu
  • USHAKUMARI T.K, Lab Assistant, Government Higher Secondary School, Angadical South
  • SINILATHA H.S, Lab Assistant, Govt.High School for Girls, Haripad
  • ASHRAF K.K, Lab Assistant, Govt.SHMH.S.S Edavanna
  • SUJESH M, Lab Assistant, Govt.Boys H.S.S Manjeri
  • VASUDEVAN V.K, Lab Assistant, Govt.Model H.S.S. Perintalmanna
  • MILLET M.C, Lab Assistant, Govt.Girls H.S.S. Ernakulam
  • ABDUL LATHEEF A.K, Lab Assistant, Govt.Girls High Secondary School, Thalassery
  • RAMESAN T.T, Lab Assistant, Govt.Girls High Secondary School, Thalassery
  • SIJI.K.C, Lab Assistant, Govt.Town H.S.S Kannur
  • REETHA K., Lab Assistant, KPRGSGHSS, Kalliasseri
  • PRAMEELA T.P, Lab Assistant, GHSS, Valapattanam
  • SUBHASH T.V, Lab Assistant, GHSS Chattukapara
  • CHITRA T, Lab Assistant, GHSS Puzhathi
  • REENA J., Lab Assistant, GHSS Pattiam
  • SAJITH R, Lab Assistant, GHSS Chavasserry
  • SHYSI P, Lab Assistant, KPRGSHSS, Kalliasseri
  • SUDHEER P.V, Lab Assistant, E.K.N.S.G.H.S.S Vengad
  • KRISHNAN ALIKKAL VEETTIL, Lab Assistant, G.H.S.S Periya
  • SUDHAKARAN K.M, Lab Assistant, G.H.S.S Hosdurg
  • VINOD C, Lab Assistant, G.F.H.S.S Cheruvathur
  • SANTHOSH KUMAR A, Lab Assistant, G.F.H.S.S Bekal
  • SASHI K., Lab Assistant, G.F.H.S.S Bekal
  • GOMESH KUMAR C.P, Lab Assistant, A.M.M.R.G.H.S.S Nallooranad

Respondents

  • STATE OF KERALA represented by the Secretary to Government, Department of General Education, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
  • THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. Kaleeswaram Raj

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri. Dilip Mohan

Case Synopsis & Summary

Petitioners, a group of Laboratory Assistants employed in various Higher Secondary Schools across Kerala, approached this Court challenging Ext.P5, an order of the Government that denies a feeder-category quota for Laboratory Assistants for appointment by transfer to HSST/HSST (Junior). They prayed for certiorari to quash Ext.P5 and mandamus directing the Government to reconsider Exts.P1 and P2 after giving an opportunity of hearing, contending that their category should be included in the feeder for promotion/transfer. The first petitioner had submitted representations seeking amendment of Special Rules to include Laboratory Assistants as a feeder category; the Government considered them and rejected the request as reflected in Ext.P5. The petitioners argued that excluding Laboratory Assistants from feeder status deprives them of a fair promotional channel and violates equitable staffing norms. The respondents maintained that appointment to HSST/HSST (Junior) is governed by the Special Rules, and there is no feeder category for Laboratory Assistants; matters of recruitment are within the employer’s domain. Citing Union of India v. Pushpa Rani & ors., 2008 (9) SCC 242, the Court noted such recruitment decisions fall within the executive domain and should not be interfered with merely because a petitioner’s category is not included. Since no challenge was mounted against the Rules themselves, Ext.P5 was found consistent with the Rules, and the petition was dismissed with no relief granted.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners argued that Ext.P5 unjustifiably excludes Laboratory Assistants from the feeder category for promotion to HSST/HSST (Junior) by transfer, despite representations to amend the Special Rules to include them. They submitted Exts.P1 and P2 for reconsideration after hearing, contending a fair promotional channel and reasonable accommodation within the recruitment framework. They also relied on a prior judgment (17.07.09) indicating a need to address the feeder issue and urged the Court to quash Ext.P5 and direct fresh consideration.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contended that appointment to HSST/HSST (Junior) is governed by the Special Rules; there is no feeder category for Laboratory Assistants; Ext.P5 aligns with those Rules; recruitment matters fall within the employer’s domain; no challenge to the Rules themselves; In light of Union of India v. Pushpa Rani & ors. (2008) 9 SCC 242, the Court should not interfere with the Government’s decision on feeder categories.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Union of India v. Pushpa Rani & ors.2008 (9) SCC 242PositiveCited to support the proposition that recruitment sources/modes and feeder-category decisions fall within the employer's domain and are not generally subject to judicial interference; the Court relies on this principle to uphold Ext.P5.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Ajith K.V. and others v. State of Kerala and Director of Higher Secondary Education and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : ## THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2010 / 12TH JYAISTHA 1932 ## WP(C).No. 16978 of 2010(V) -------------------------- ## PETITIONER(S): - --------------- ## 1. AJITH K.V, LAB ASSISTANT, G.G.H.S.S.MATTANCHERRY ERNAKULAM-682002 ## 2. RAHUL T.G., LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.H.S.S.TRICKODITHANAM, CHANGANASSERRY, KOTTAYAM DIST. ## 3. BINDU P.V, LAB ASSISTANT, KSGHSS, KADAPRA, VALANJAVATTOM P.O, THIRUVALLA, KOTTAYAM DIST. ## 4. INDU K.N, LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.H.S.S.PAZHAMTHOTTAM, PAZHAMTHOTTAM P.O, ERNAKULAM DIST. 5. SEMEENA T.A., LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.H.S.S.PAZHAMTHOTTAM, PAZHAMTHOTTAM P.O, ERNAKULAM DIST. ## 6. KRISHNAKUMAR K.G, LAB ASSISTANT, GHSS, MULANTHURUTHY MULANTHURUTHY P.O, ERNAKULAM DIST. ## 7. SUSANTH P.S, LAB ASSISTANT, GHSS VANIYAMBALAM VANIYAMBALAM P.O, MALAPPURAM DIST. ## 8. SAJESH P.G, LAB ASSISTANT, GHSS PANG, PANG CHENDY P.O KOLATHUR VIA, MALAPPURAM DIST. 9. SAJITH M, LAB ASSISTANT, GRHSS KOTTAKKAL, KOTTAKKAL P.O, MALAPPURAM DIST. 10.SINDU K., LAB ASSISTANT, GHSS MANKADA, MANKADA P.O MALAPPURAM DIST. 11. PREM SANKAR S, LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.H.S.S POOVAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. ## 12. SREEJA K, LAB ASSISTANT, G..H.S.S ATHAVANAD, ATHAVANAD P.O, TIRUNNAVAYA VIA, MALAPPURAM DIST. ## 13. SHIBILI BALAKRISHNAN, LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL FOR GIRLS, NADAKKAVU KOZHIKODE DIST. 14. USHAKUMARI T.K, LAB ASSISTANT, GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, ANGADICAL SOUTH, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DIST. 15. SINILATHA H.S, LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL FOR GIRLS, HARIPPAD, ALAPPUZHA DIST. 16. ASHRAF K.K, LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.SHMH.S.S EDAVANNA EDAVANNA, MALAPPURAM DIST. 17. SUJESH M, LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.BOYS H.S.S MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DIST. 18. VASUDEVAN V.K, LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.MODEL H.S.S. PERINTALMANNA, PERINTALMANNA P.O, MALAPPURAM DIST. 19. MILLET M.C, LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.GIRLS H.S.S. ERNAKULAM ERNAKULAM DIST. 20. ABDUL LATHEEF A.K, LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THALASSERRY, KANNUR DIST. 21. RAMESAN T.T, LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THALASSERRY, KANNUR DIST. 22. SIJI.K.C, LAB ASSISTANT, GOVT.TOWN H.S.S KANNUR, KANNUR DIST. 23. REETHA K., LAB ASSISTANT, KPRGSGHSS, KALLIASSERI, KANNUR DIST. 24. PRAMEELA T.P, LAB ASSISTANT, GHSS, VALAPATTANAM KANNUR DIST. 25. SUBHASH T.V, LAB ASSISTANT, GHSS CHATTUKAPARA, KANNUR DIST. 26. CHITRA T, LAB ASSISTANT, GHSS, PUZHATHI , P.O KOTTALI, KANNUR DIST. 27. REENA J., LAB ASSISTANT, GHSS, PATTIAM, P.O PATHAYAKUNNU, KANNUR DIST. 28. SAJITH R, LAB ASSISTANT, GHSS CHAVASSERRY CHAVASSERRY P.O, KANNUR DIST. 29. SHYSI P, LAB ASSISTANT, KPRGSHSS, KALLIASSERI KANNUR DIST. 30. SUDHEER P.V, LAB ASSISTANT, E.K.N.S.G.H.S.S VENGAD KANNUR. 31. KRISHNAN ALIKKAL VEETTIL, LAB ASSISTANT, G.H.S.S PERIYA, P.O PERIYA, KASARGODE DIST. 32. SUDHAKARAN K.M, LAB ASSISTANT, G.H.S.S.HOSDURG, P.O KANHANGAD, KASARGODE DIST. 33. VINOD C, LAB ASSISTANT, G.F.H.S.S CHERUVATHUR, P.O THURUTHI, KASARGOD DIST. 34. SANTHOSH KUMAR A, LAB ASSISTANT, G.F.H.S.S BEKAL P.O BEKAL, KASARGODE DIST. 35. SASHI K., LAB ASSISTANT, G.F.H.S.S BEKAL P.O BEKAL, KASARGOD DIST. 36. GOMESH KUMAR C.P, LAB ASSISTANT, A.M.M.R.G.H.S.S NALLOORNAD, KUNNAMANGALAM P.O, WAYANAD DIST. ## BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ ## RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ## 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ## GOVT.PLEADER SRI.DILIP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ## **C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.** ## **-------------------------------------------W.P.(C). NO.16978 OF 2010** ## **--------------------------------------------** Dated this the 2[nd] day of June, 2010 ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioners are working as Laboratory Assistants in various Higher Secondary Schools in the State. Their grievance is with respect to the non-prescription of a quota for Laboratory assistants in the matter of promotion to the post of Higher Secondary School Teacher and Higher Secondary School Teacher (Junior). This Writ Petition has been filed mainly with the following prayers: _i) to issue a writ of certiorari quashing Ext.P5 as unjust, illegal and unsustainable; ii) to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider Exts.P1 and P2 afresh after giving an opportunity of being heard, petitioners or their representatives, untrammeled by the stand taken in Ext.P5._ 2. The first petitioner has submitted a representation before the Government, which in essence, carried a prayer for amending the Special Rules so as to include the category of Laboratory Assistant in the feeder category for appointment by transfer to the post of H.S.S.T/ HSST (Junior). The said representation was considered by the Government in **W.P.(C) NO.16978/2010** 2 the light of the Special Rules for appointment to the post of H.S.S.T/ H.S.S.T(Junior). After such consideration, the said request was rejected as per Ext.P5. In Ext.P5, it is stated thus: _In short, in the Department of Higher Secondary Education appointment to the post of HSST/HSST (Junior) is either by transfer from qualified HSST (Junior)/HSAs/UPSAs/LPSAs or by direct recruitment. No quota reservation is earmarked for ministerial staff/Laboratory Assistants. As per Special Rules for the Post of HSST (Junior) 25% of the total posts are filled up by transfer from qualified HSAs on seniority basis (in their absence by transfer from qualified UPSA/LPSAs). In Vocational Higher Secondary Education, Laboratory Technical Assistants are eligible for appointment by transfer to the post of Vocational Instructor only and not Vocational Teacher. Chances are open to the qualified Laboratory Assistants of Higher Secondary Education Department for direct recruitment. Providing quota reservation to the different categories on individual aspiration is not a good precedent._ _Hence the request is disposed of as rejected. The judgment dated 17.07.09 from the Hon'ble High Court is complied with accordingly._ 2. It is thus obvious from Ext.P5 that the claim of the petitioners was considered by the first respondent in the light of the special Rules. Admittedly, the category of Laboratory Assistants is not a feeder category for appointment to the post of HSST/HSST (Junior). The question of deleting or adding categories as feeder categories for promotion or appointment by transfer to a particular post and such other matters relating **W.P.(C) NO.16978/2010** 3 service conditions are matters falling within the domain of the executive Government. In the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in _**Union of India v. Pushpa Rani & ors.**_ reported in **2008 (9) SCC 242** , this Court cannot interfere with such matters merely on the ground that the category to which the petitioners belong has not been included in the feeder category. The Hon'ble Apex Court held that matters relating to sources/mode of recruitment, selection criteria etc., fell in employer's domain. That apart, in this case, there is no challenge against the Special Rules for the Kerala Higher Secondary Education State Service or the Special Rules for the Kerala Higher Secondary Education Subordinate Service relating appointment to the post of HSST/HSST (Junior). Therefore, Ext.P5 being an order passed in tune with the Special Rules calls for no interference. There is no merit in the contentions of the petitioners and the Writ Petition is accordingly, dismissed. ## **(C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE)** ## **spc** 4 ## **W.P.(C) NO.16978/2010** **C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.** **W.P.(C). NO. /2010 JUDGMENT June, 2010** # **W.P.(C) NO.16978/2010** 5