High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; writ petition disposed with direct...

Abdurahiman v. District Collector, Palakkad, Land Tribunal (LR), Pattambi, Village Officer, Parudur, State of Kerala

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.254 OF 2021(F)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-01-18
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi to dispose of S.M.No.1032/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri ( supra ). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; writ petition disposed with directions to dispose of S.M.1032/2020 in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri's directions; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Abdurahiman aged 68 years S/o.Mohammed, Keezhuveettill, Irinmbiliyamm, Malappuram District

Respondents

  • District Collector Palakkad-678 001
  • The Land Tribunal/Special Tahsildar (LR), Pattambi, Mini Civil Station, P.O. Kanniyampuram, Ottapalam-691 104
  • The Village Officer, Parudur Village Office, P.O. Parudur-679 312
  • State of Kerala, represented by the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram-695 001

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. Sri. P. Jayaram

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt. A.C. Vidhya - Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Abdurahiman filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to compel the Special Tahasildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M. No.1032/2020 before the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, in a suo motu proceeding under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970. The subject matter concerns the vesting of Land Reform rights in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and the issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the Rules, in respect of 0.0620 hectares of land described as Re-survey Nos. 147/9 and 147/12 in Parudur village, Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District. The petitioner, a 68-year-old senior citizen, argues for expeditious disposal of the application to obtain a purchase certificate, essential for loan arrangements and securing his rights. The Government Pleader counters that there is a large pendency—11,078 suo motu proceedings—in the Land Tribunal, and urges adherence to due process and seniority. The Court invokes Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and others (2018) to emphasize that cases must be disposed of in accordance with seniority and within the time frames laid down, even as reports may be obtained through Village Officers. Consequently, the petition is disposed by directing the Pattambi Land Tribunal to decide S.M. No. 1032/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD, dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Senior citizens' priority in disposal of cases (as reflected in Narayanan Namboodiri directives)
  • Disposal of cases in accordance with seniority (seniority of registration)
  • Expeditious disposal of cases pending before Land Tribunals
  • No breaking of the seniority of cases unless directed by Court or higher authority

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner argues for expeditious disposal of S.M. No.1032/2020 in Pattambi Land Tribunal, on the basis that he is a senior citizen and the outcome is necessary for securing a loan and confirming his rights under the Kerala Land Reforms Act. He relies on the decision in Narayanan Namboodiri to press for priority to senior citizens and adherence to the seniority regime in disposal of cases.

Contentions of Respondents

The Government Pleader points to the heavy pendency before the Land Tribunal (approximately 11,078 suo motu cases) and emphasizes the need to follow due process and seniority, while utilizing available mechanisms (e.g., Village Officers) to obtain reports as needed.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveCited to justify directions for expeditious disposal and prioritization of senior citizens; the judgment directs Land Tribunals to follow seniority-based disposal and to obtain necessary reports through Village Officers as needed, which the present Court adopts.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Abdurahiman v. District Collector, Palakkad, Land Tribunal (LR), Pattambi, Village Officer, Parudur, State of Kerala and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 28TH POUSHA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.254 OF 2021(F)** ## **PETITIONER:** **ABDURAHIMAN AGED 68 YEARS S/O.MOHAMMED, KEEZHUVEETTIL, IRIMBILIYAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SRI.P.JAYARAM** ## **RESPONDENT:** - **1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PALAKKAD-678 001.** - **2 THE LAND TRIBUNAL/SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, (LAND FEFORMS), PATTAMBI, MINI CIVIL STATION, P.O.KANNIYAMPURAM, OTTAPALAM-691 104.** - **3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PARUDUR VILLAGE OFFICE, P.O.PARUDUR-679 312.** - **4 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.** ## **SMT A.C.VIDHYA-GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** WP(C)No.254 of 2021 2 ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.1032/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0620 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.Nos.147/9 and 147/12 in Block No.18 of Parudur Village in Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] WP(C)No.254 of 2021 3 this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action WP(C)No.254 of 2021 4 necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. WP(C)No.254 of 2021 5 - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ WP(C)No.254 of 2021 6 RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Parudur Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.1032/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 14.12.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 68 years. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.1032/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. WP(C)No.254 of 2021 7 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.1032/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE** **yd** WP(C)No.254 of 2021 8 ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 14.12.2020 IN SM 1032/2020 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND REFORMS), PATTAMBI. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 01.12.2020 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER WITH RESPECT TO HIS PROPERTIES BEARING RE-SURVEY NO.147/9 AND 147/12 VILLAGE OFFICE, PARUDUR. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 02.11.2020 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER WITH RESPECT TO HIS PROPERTIES BEARING RE-SURVEY NO.147/9 AND 147/12 AND OTHER PROPERTIES FROM VILLAGE OFFICE, PARUDUR.** ## **RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL** **TRUE COPY** **P.A. TO JUDGE**