High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; No order as to costs. Land Tribuna...

Abdurahiman v. Deputy Collector (LR) Land Tribunal, Malappuram

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.4536 OF 2021(N)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-22
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Malappuram, to dispose of S.M.No.306/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri and other applicable guidance; no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; No order as to costs. Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.306/2020 according to Narayanan Namboodiri directions and law.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Abdurahiman

Respondents

  • Deputy Collector (LR) Land Tribunal, Malappuram, Malappuram District, Kerala

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • K.P. Shereef (Adv.)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Vidhya A.C. (Government Pleader)

Case Synopsis & Summary

Abdurahiman v. Deputy Collector (LR) Land Tribunal, Malappuram is a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus to compel the Deputy Collector to decide S.M. No.306/2020 in the Land Tribunal, Malappuram. The suo motu proceedings were initiated under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The land involved is 21.80 acres in Re.Sy.No.46/5-20 in Kuruva Village, Perinthalmanna Taluk. The petitioner, a 61-year-old senior citizen, contends that the Court should expedite disposal and that delay defeats the purpose of access to credit and development. The Government Pleader points to a large pendency (8514) of suo motu matters and cautions against breaking the seniority. The Court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and other cases (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017) which laid down directions for expeditious disposal on seniority basis, and that Village Officers may assist in obtaining necessary reports. Following these directions, the Court directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M. No.306/2020 in strict accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Constitution of India Article 226Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 99Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that, being a 61-year-old senior citizen, he is entitled to expeditious disposal of the case under the established directions for prioritizing senior citizens and maintaining the seniority of cases. He argues for mandamus to expedite S.M. No.306/2020 and to utilize available mechanisms (e.g., Village Officers) to obtain necessary reports, ensuring due process and compliance with law from the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, read with Sections 72 and 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent pleader highlights the heavy pendency of suo motu proceedings (8514) and asserts that disposal must adhere to the court’s directions and the principle of seniority. It cautions against out-of-turn disposal, noting the Government’s directive facilitating reports through Village Officers and urges adherence to Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions and the statutory framework to ensure orderly processing within the outer time limits unless stayed.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveCourt relies on and applies the directions from Narayanan Namboodiri for expeditious disposal and for following seniority-based processing; treats this case as binding guidance.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Abdurahiman v. Deputy Collector (LR) Land Tribunal, Malappuram and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.4536 OF 2021(N)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **ABDURAHIMAN, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.MOHAMMED, PARANGODATH HOUSE, CHERIYAMUNDAM AMSOM, DESOM, P.O.CHERIYAMUNDAM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SHEREEF** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR) LAND TRIBUNAL, MALAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA PIN 676 101** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT VIDHYA A.C- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.4536 OF 2021(N) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Deputy Collector (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.306/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Malappuram, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Malappuram under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 21.80 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.46/5-20 of Kuruva Village in Perinthalmanna Taluk, Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.4536 OF 2021(N) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.4536 OF 2021(N) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.4536 OF 2021(N) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.4536 OF 2021(N) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kuruva Village, the Land Tribunal, Malappuram, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.306/2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 61 years. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Malappuram is 8514. W.P(C).No.4536 OF 2021(N) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Malappuram can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.306/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Malappuram, to dispose of S.M.No.306/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.4536 OF 2021(N) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **COPY OF THE PETITIONER'S TITLE DEED NUMBER 2951/2019 OF SRO MAKKARAPARAMBA DATED 3.10.2019**