High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; Land Tribunal directed to dispose ...

Abdullakutty v. Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur and Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Land Tribunal, Tirur

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.2720 OF 2021(L)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-03
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M. No.1126/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment referred to supra. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; Land Tribunal directed to dispose of S.M. No.1126/2020 strictly in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri directions; No order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • ABDULLAKUTTY, aged 62 years S/O. MUHAMMED, Appade House, Ozhur P.O., Malappuram District

Respondents

  • LAND TRIBUNAL (LAND REFORMS), Tirur, Malappuram District-679 101
  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LAND REFORMS), LAND TRIBUNAL, Tirur, Malappuram District-679 101

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri U.K. Devidas

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT Vidya A.C - Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Abdullakutty, aged 62 years, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent, Special Tahasildar (LR), to conduct an expeditious enquiry and dispose of S.M.No.1126/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 for assignment of the right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, in respect of 5.26 acres of land in Sy.No.44/2, Ozhur Village, Malappuram District. The petitioner submits that, as a senior citizen, he is entitled to expeditious disposal so that he may obtain a purchase certificate and, if needed, access loan facilities. The Government Pleader points to a substantial pendency of suo motu proceedings (4,987) before the Tirur Land Tribunal. The Court recalls the Narayanan Namboodiri decision (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017) and the directions therein, emphasizing seniority-based disposal, reporting via Village Officers, and expeditious processing of senior-citizen cases (six months) and others (18 months), while preserving procedure and not breaking seniority. The Court directs disposal of S.M.No.1126/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following those directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Constitution of India, Article 226Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 99Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD (dated 22.02.2018)

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Priority to senior citizens in expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal matters
  • Seniorities must be preserved; cases should be disposed on the basis of registration seniority
  • Expeditious disposal of cases (as per Narayanan Namboodiri directions)
  • Use of Village Officers for obtaining required reports to expedite proceedings

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that he is a senior citizen and requires expeditious disposal of the suo motu proceedings in S.M.No.1126/2020 to enable him to obtain a certificate of purchase and access financing. He relies on the decision in Narayanan Namboodiri to urge priority in disposal based on seniority, and on GO 2018 RD for enabling expedited action via Village Officers for report collection, to ensure timely resolution while maintaining due process.

Contentions of Respondents

Respondents emphasize the enormous pendency before the Tirur Land Tribunal (4,987 suo motu proceedings) and underscore the need to follow established seniority-based timelines and due process. They argue Notices to landlords and the collection of reports via Village Officers should continue, and that resource constraints and workload must be considered. The respondents assert that the court’s directions must be applied in a manner that preserves procedural integrity and does not derail the ongoing disposal process.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017PositiveThe judgment relies on the Narayanan Namboodiri decision to adopt its directives on expeditious disposal, seniority-based processing, and use of Village Officers for reporting, which the current court follows.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Abdullakutty v. Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur and Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Land Tribunal, Tirur and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 14TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.2720 OF 2021(L)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **ABDULLAKUTTY, AGED 62 YEARS S/O. MUHAMMED, APPADE HOUSE, OZHUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**LAND TRIBUNAL**| |---|---| ||**(LAND REFORMS), TIRUR, TIRUR P.O.,**| ||**MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 101.**| |**2**|**SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LAND REFORMS),**| ||**LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR, TIRUR P.O.,**| ||**MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 101.**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT VIDHYA A.C- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.2720 OF 2021(L) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.1126/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 05.26 Ares of land comprised in Sy.No.44/2 of Ozhur Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.2720 OF 2021(L) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.2720 OF 2021(L) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers W.P(C).No.2720 OF 2021(L) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.2720 OF 2021(L) -6- ## directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Ozhur, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.1126/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 31.10.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 62 years. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land W.P(C).No.2720 OF 2021(L) **==> picture [17 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.1126/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M. No.1126/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.2720 OF 2021(L) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 31.10.2020 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.**