High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of; no order as to costs.

Abdul Gafoor v. Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur and Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Land Tribunal, Tirur

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.6042 OF 2021(E)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-03-09
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of; Land Tribunal, Tirur directed to dispose of S.M.No.888/2020 strictly in accordance with law and following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Abdul Gafoor

Respondents

  • Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur, Malappuram District
  • Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Land Tribunal, Tirur, Malappuram District

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI U.K. Devidas

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Government Pleader/Respondents

Case Synopsis & Summary

Abdul Gafoor, a writ petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeks a mandamus to the Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and dispose of S.M. No.888/2020 pending in the Land Tribunal, Tirur, under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. The suo motu proceedings were initiated to vest the landlord’s right in the Government under Section 72 and to issue a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, read with Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, in respect of 8.3688 acres in Re.Sy.No.310/13, Edappal Village. The petitioner contends undue delay and seeks to accelerate the process, relying on Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and another (14.03.2018) which directed expeditious disposal of such applications by following seniority and allowing use of Village Officer reports when Revenue Inspector reports are delayed. The Court reiterated that Land Tribunals must not derail the process, but should observe seniority, provide for notices as deemed fit, and adhere to timelines (six months for senior citizens, 18 months for others). It observed the substantial pendency of suo motu matters and directed the Tirur Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.888/2020 in accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus to compel expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M. No.888/2020, arguing that delays undermine the purpose of vesting and assignment under the Kerala Land Reforms Act and that expeditious disposal is mandated by earlier directions in Narayanan Namboodiri. He urges adherence to seniority-based disposal timelines and prompt action to avoid collateral losses such as loan refusals from banks.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend that disposal must follow the seniority-based approach and cannot be derailed; they point to substantial pendency (thousands of suo motu cases) and the need to obtain reports through Village Officers if Revenue Inspector reports are delayed; they emphasize that the court’s directions should be implemented without compromising due process and that notices may be issued as deemed fit to balance efficiency with legal requirements.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases (Judgment dated 14.03.2018)PositiveCited with approval; its directions for expeditious disposal and use of Village Officers' reports, prioritization of senior citizens, and seniority-based timelines are adopted and followed in the present case.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Abdul Gafoor v. Land Tribunal (Land Reforms), Tirur and Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Land Tribunal, Tirur and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 18TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.6042 OF 2021(E)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **ABDUL GAFOOR, AGED 46 YEARS S/O ABOOBACKER, KALLINGAL HOUSE, EDAPPAL.P.O., MALAPURAM DISTRICT-679576.** **BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 LAND TRIBUNAL, (LAND REFORMS) TIRUR, TIRUR.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679101. 2 SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, (LAND REFORMS), LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRUR, TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679101.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **VIDYA AC GP** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.6042 OF 2021(E) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.888/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirur, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 08.3688 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.310/13 of Edappal Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.6042 OF 2021(E) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.6042 OF 2021(E) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers ## W.P(C).No.6042 OF 2021(E) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.6042 OF 2021(E) -6- ## directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Edappal Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.888/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P1 certificate dated 26.08.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirur is 4987. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.888/2020 W.P(C).No.6042 OF 2021(E) **==> picture [17 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 9. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirur, to dispose of S.M.No.888/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.6042 OF 2021(E) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO.F2009 S.R.DATED 26/08/2020 IN SM.NO.888/2020 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.**