High Court of KeralaDivision BenchWrit petition disposed of with directions to en...

A. Anil Kumar v. Travancore Devaswom Board and Others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) No. 26326 of 2019
Neutral Citation:/

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
  • P. G. Ajithkumar
Judgment Date
2022-03-21
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of. Reliefs 1–3 deemed infructuous. The court directed the respondents to comply with the directions of Satheesh v. Travancore Devaswom Board and the law laid down in Shali v. State of Kerala, Kottamom Sri Darmasastha Temple Advisory Committee v. State of Kerala, and Sivaprasad v. State of Kerala, in letter and spirit. It ordered adherence to the boundary fixation, layout of temporary shops, and non-encroachment of right of way/pedestrian facilities on Thuravoor Junction Road and National Highway-66, ensuring safety of pedestrians, cyclists, children, elderly, differently-abled persons, and free vehicular traffic. The disposal emphasizes compliance with the cited decisions and safety standards rather than continuing the petition’s reliefs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with directions to ensure strict compliance with the cited precedents and safety/utility standards; reliefs 1–3 held infructuous; final order requires adherence to boundary, layout, and non-encroachment measures and safe traffic flow.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • A. Anil Kumar

Respondents

  • Travancore Devaswom Board, rep. by its Secretary, NANTHANCODE, Trivandrum – 605 036
  • The Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board, NantHancode, Trivandrum – 605 036
  • The Administrative Officer, Thuravoor Devaswom, Travancore Devaswom Board, Thuravoor P.O., Alappuzha – 688 532
  • The Executive Engineer, National Highway, Mini Civil Station, Thattampally, Alappuzha – 688 013
  • The Assistant Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Road Division, Alappuzha – 688 001
  • THE THURAVOOR MAHA KSHETHRA UPADESAKA SAMITHI, rep. by the President, B.Sudhakara Menon, Kshethra Upadesaka Samithi Office, Thuravoor, Alappuzha – 688 532
  • T.MahaDevan, S/o. Thankappan Achari, Puthren Veedu, Thuravoor (Vice President, Thuravoor Kshethra Upadesaka Samithi, Thuravoor, Alappuzha) – 688 532

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri.C.S.Manilal
  • • Sri.S.Nidheesh

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri.B.Pramod
  • • Sri.P.Martin Jose
  • • Sri.S.Rajmohan, SC, Travancore Devaswom Board

Case Synopsis & Summary

Anil Kumar, a devotee of Sree Narasimha Swami Thuravoor Temple under the Travancore Devaswom Board, approached the Kerala High Court under Article 226 seeking a declaration that the Temple Advisory Committee (TAC) lacks authority to form Steering and Sub-Committees by nominating outsiders, arguing that such committees constituted during the 2018 festival were illegal and contrary to law. He sought a writ of mandamus restraining the Board and the 6th respondent from conducting the 2019 Thuravoor festival through outsider-created Steering/Sub-Committees, and prayed for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to oversee the festival from 19.10.2019 to 27.10.2019. He also sought to restrain the auctioning or leasing of public spaces belonging to the PWD for commercial activities in view of Ext.P10 (the court’s 2016 judgment in W.P.(C) No.33129/2015). The petition was admitted, notices issued, and the 6th respondent filed counter affidavits. The court observed that reliefs 1–3 had become infructuous and, on the remaining relief, disposed of the matter by endorsing the directions in Satheesh v. Travancore Devaswom Board and related precedents (Shali, Kottamom Sri Darmasastha Temple Advisory Committee v. State of Kerala, Sivaprasad) “in letter and spirit.” The court mandated compliance with these decisions, including ensuring that any temporary stalls do not encroach on the right of way or pedestrian facilities and that safety and free vehicular movement on nearby roads are preserved, consistent with the boundary/layout directives. The petition was thus disposed of with directions to implement the cited precedents and safeguards.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that the Temple Advisory Committee lacks authority to nominate Steering/Sub-Committees consisting of non-TAC members, arguing that such formations during the 2018 festival were illegal and violative of legal and bye-law provisions. He sought a declaration to void such actions, a mandamus restraining the Board and the 6th respondent from 2019 festival arrangements through outsider committees, and appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to oversee the festival period; further, he urged restraint on auctioning/lease of public spaces as per Ext.P10.

Contentions of Respondents

Not explicitly detailed in the excerpt of the judgment; the order focuses on compliance with binding precedents and safety/layout directives rather than a recital of respondents’ pleaded stand.

Cited Precedents (6)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Satheesh v. Travancore Devaswom Board and others2022 (1) KLT 940PositiveCourt relies on the directions and law laid down in Satheesh to guide compliance and direct steps for governance of the Thuravoor temple festival and associated activities.
Shali v. State of Kerala2019 (4) KLT 484 = 2019 (5) KHC 118PositiveDescribed as part of the governing law to be complied with, forming part of the letter-and-spirit directive.
Kottamom (Kottiyar Mangalam) Sri.Darmasastha Temple Advisory Committee v. State of Kerala2019 (4) KLT OnLine 3081 = 2019 (5) KHC SN 27PositiveListed among decisions to be followed in letter and spirit.
Sivaprasad v. State of Kerala and others2020 (5) KLT OnLine 1065 = 2020 (6) KHC 373PositiveCited as part of the precedent to be observed in implementing the directions.
W.P.(C). No. 33129/15W.P.(C). No. 33129/15Mentioned OnlyReferenced as Ext.P10; the judgment’s disposition relies on compliance with earlier order but does not treat this citation as controlling within the present decision.
W.P.(C). No. 25334/13W.P.(C). No. 25334/13Mentioned OnlyCited in Appendix exhibits; not a controlling factor in the disposal.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against A. Anil Kumar v. Travancore Devaswom Board and Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** ## **&** **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR** **MONDAY, THE 21[ST] DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 26326 OF 2019** **PETITIONER:** **A.ANILKUMAR, AGED 52 YEARS S/O.ARAVINDAKSHAN NAIR, SREELEXMI, THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.** **BY ADVS.SRI.C.S.MANILAL SRI.S.NIDHEESH** ## **RESPONDENTS:** - **1 THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, NANTHANCODE, TRIVANDRUM – 605 036.** - **2 THE COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE, TRIVANDRUM – 605 036.** - **3 THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, THURAVOOR DEVASWOM, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, THURAVOOR P.O., ALAPPUZHA – 688 532.** - **4 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAY, MINI CIVIL STATION, THATTAMPALLY, ALAPPUZHA – 688 013.** - **5 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D.ROAD DIVISION, ALAPPUZHA – 688 001.** -2- W.P.(C). No.26326 of 2019 **6 THE THURAVOOR MAHA KSHETHRA UPADESAKA SAMITHI, REP. BY THE PRESIDENT, B.SUDHAKARA MENON, KSHETHRA UPADESAKA SAMITHI OFFICE, THURAVOOR, ALAPPUZHA – 688 532.** **7 T.MAHADEVAN, S/O.THANKAPPAN ACHARI, PUTRHEN VEEDU, THURAVOOR (VICE PRESIDENT, THURAVOOR KSHETHRA UPDESAKA SAMITHI, THURAVOOR, ALAPPUZHA) – 688 532.** **BY ADVS.SRI.B.PRAMOD SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.S.RAJMOHAN, SC, TDB** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** -3- W.P.(C). No.26326 of 2019 ## **JUDGMENT** Anil K. Narendran, J. The petitioner, who is a devotee of Sree Narasimha Swami of Thuravoor Temple, which is under the management of the 1[st] respondent Travancore Devaswom Board in Vaikom Group, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a declaration that the Temple Advisory Committee in Sree Narasimha Swami Temple has no authority or jurisdiction to form Steering Committee or SubCommittee by nominating persons who are not members of the Temple Advisory Committee and the formation and functioning of such committee made during 2018 festival is illegal and contrary to law. The petitioners have also sought for a writ of mandamus restraining the Board and the 6[th] respondent from conducting festival for the year 2019 at Thuravoor Devaswom by forming Steering Committee or SubCommittee under it by persons who are strangers and not members elected to the Temple Advisory Committee; a writ of mandamus appointing an Advocate Commissioner by this Court to oversee and to conduct the annual festival of Thuravoor Temple scheduled on 19.10.2019 and ends on -4- W.P.(C). No.26326 of 2019 27.10.2019; and a writ of mandamus restraining respondents 1 and 6 from auctioning or otherwise letting the public places belongs to PWD for commercial activities including erection of shops or for other purposes in view of Ext.P10 judgment of this Court dated 27.01.2016 in W.P.(C)No.33129 of 2015. 2. On 03.10.2019, when this writ petition came up for admission, this Court admitted the matter on file and the respective Standing Counsel took notice for respondents 1 to 4. The learned Government Pleader took notice for the 5[th] respondent and notice by speed post was ordered to respondents 6 and 7. 3. The 6[th] respondent has filed counter affidavits opposing the reliefs sought for in this writ petition. 4. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, it is noticed that relief Nos.1 to 3 have already become infructuous. Insofar as relief No.4 is concerned, the issue is covered by the decision of this Court in **Satheesh v.** ## **Travancore Devaswom Board and others [2022 (1) KLT** **940]** , whereby this Court has directed the Travancore Devaswom Board and the official respondents to take -5- W.P.(C). No.26326 of 2019 necessary steps to ensure strict compliance of the directions contained in the said judgment and also the law laid down in **Shali v. State of Kerala [2019 (4) KLT 484 = 2019 (5) KHC 118]** , **Kottamom (Kottiyar Mangalam) Sri.Darmasastha Temple Advisory Committee v. State of Kerala [2019 (4) KLT OnLine 3081 = 2019 (5) KHC SN 27]** and **Sivaprasad v. State of Kerala and others [2020 (5) KLT OnLine 1065 = 2020 (6) KHC 373]** in letter and spirit. In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents herein to take necessary steps to ensure strict compliance of the directions contained in this judgment and the law laid down in the decisions referred to supra, in letter and spirit, by ensuring that any temporary stalls erected in connection with any festival in Thuravoor Mahakshethram is without any encroachment whatsoever on the right of way or on the pedestrian facilities provided as per the relevant Specifications and Standards on ChavadiThuravoor Junction Road and National Highway-66, in order to ensure the safety of most vulnerable road users, such as -6- W.P.(C). No.26326 of 2019 pedestrians, cyclists, children, elderly and the differentlyabled persons, and also to ensure free movement of vehicular traffic through the carriage way of those roads and the service road on the side of the National Highway. The directions contained in paragraphs 25 to 27 of **Satheesh [2022 (1) KLT 940]** , regarding fixation of the boundary of the property of Thurvoor Mahakshethram and preparation of layout of temporary shops to be erected during festival season, shall be complied with by the concerned respondents, within the time limit fixed by this Court. Sd/- ## **ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE** Sd/- ## **P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE** AV/22/3 -7- W.P.(C). No.26326 of 2019 ## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26326/2019** **PETITIONER EXHIBITS** - **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE BYE LAW OF THE TEMPLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE DATED 30/11/2011.** - **EXHIBIT P2** - **TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE ANNUAL GENERAL BODY DATED 24/8/2019.** - **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS DATED 15/9/2019.** - **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DATED 5/12/2018.** - **EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DATED 25/10/2018.** - **EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION UNDER THE RTI ACT BY SURENDRANATH DATED 25/10/2018.** - **EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER DATED 5/11/2018.** - **EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) 25334/13 DATED 24/10/2013.** - **EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE THURAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH DATED 5/3/2014.** - **EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) 33129/15 DATED 27/1/2016.** **EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE QUOTATION BY THE BOARD DATED 1/10/2018.** -8- W.P.(C). No.26326 of 2019 - **EXHIBIT P12** **TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS REPORTED IN MATHRUBHOOMI DAILY DATED 30/9/2019.** - **EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF QUOTATION OF THE BOARD 26/9/2019.** - **EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 06.06.2019** - **EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF REMINDER ALONG WITH DECISION OF THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS DATED 07.08.2019** - **EXHIBIT P16 TRUE COPY OF THE INFORMATION OBTAINED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT DATED 09.07.2019** - **RESPONDENT EXHIBITS** - **EXHIBIT R6(a) TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.09.2018 OF THE DBP NO 52/2018 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT** - **EXHIBIT R6(b) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE GENERAL BODY MEATING HELD ON 24.2.2019** - **EXHIBIT R6(c) TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF SUB COMMITTEES AND THE STEERING COMMITTEE FORMED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT** - **EXHIBIT R6(d) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE GENERAL BODY MEETING HELD ON 28.8.2017** - **EXHIBIT R7(a) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21/10/2019.** **EXHIBIT R7(b) TRUE COPY OF THE T WRITTEN REQUEST MADE BY THE TAC MEMBERS TO CONVEY THE T.A.C.MEETING.** -9- W.P.(C). No.26326 of 2019 **EXHIBIT R7(c)** **EXHIBIT R1(c)** **EXHIBIT R6(e) [produced as R6(a)]** **EXHIBIT R6(f) [produced as R6(b)]** **TRUE COPY OF NEWS ITEM APPEARED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 20-102019.** **TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.ROC 22699/8/NS-2 DATED 29.01.2020 OF THE DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER.** **TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT APPEARED IN MATHRUBHOOMI DAILY DATED 19.10.2019** **TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 19.10.2019**